The three major issues that cut across psychology are stability versus change, rationality versus irrationality and nature-nurture issue.
Stability versus change deals with the issue of whether human beings change as they grow older or they remain essentially the same.
Rational versus irrationality illustrates the disparity between a human's mind ability to perceive and interpret correctly or incorrectly.
Nature - nurture issue centered on the relative contribution of genetic inheritance and environmental factors to human development.
For number one, wolves may eat fish instead of larger animals because those larger animals may be going into hibernation and also the berries that a wolf may eat has also gone out of season, leaving the only choice really being fish.
For number two, over harvesting salmon is pretty bad when it comes to the environment. it takes away food from predators, like the wolves in number one, so they lose a source of food and it also takes away the salmons ability to eat the smaller organisms in the stream, so they're going to become overpopulated.
If we were to differentiate anthroprocentric and biocentric views of the environment you could say that anthroprocentric is more holistic than biocentric. They consider the importance of the environment to human beings. Biocentric sees humans as an individual part of the environment.
Also Biocentric views tend to focus more on biotic factors (living things) and anthroprocentric veer towards the abiotic factors (non-living things).
I’m pretty sure it is Sediments I think
