Answer:
Option A. Liable, because notice to Emmett is notice to Fridley.
Explanation:
The reason is that the principle is liable for the outcome of the Emmett actions in the principle's behalf. So it is clear that Fridley is liable. The agent have to work in the best interest of its principal which means that the failure to notify the additional tax liability to Fridley was part of agent's fiduciary duty. This means that the principle can sue its agent for the consequences of not placing the sufficient care to its principle.
The Fridley is also responsible because Emmett is acting as Fridley which means the notice to Emmett is actually notice to Fridley.
Option D
In the short-run, if there is a surplus in the market for a product, the rationing function of price can be expected to cause: a decrease in the market price of the product.
<h3><u>
Explanation:</u></h3>
When quantity provided surpasses quantity required, a surplus endures. If the value goes up, the amount of necessitated goes downward. If the price drops, the quantity required raises. Price ceilings limit a price from growing beyond a particular level.
When a price ceiling is fixed under the equilibrium price, the amount required will pass quantity fulfilled, and excess demand or deficits will result. Price floors block a price from dropping below a reliable level. When a price floor is fixed beyond the equilibrium price, the measure supplied will exceed the quantity needed, and excess stock or surpluses will happen.
Based on the amount you pay now and the increase in insurance premiums, your annual insurance costs next year would be $6,325.
<h3>What is the next insurance cost next year?</h3>
The annual cost of insurance refers to the amount that is paid in premiums in a year.
That cost is currently $5,500 but will increase by 15%.
= Current insurance cost x ( 1 + rate of increase)
Solving gives:
= 5,500 x ( 1 + 15%)
= $6,325
Find out more on insurance cost at brainly.com/question/4953989.
Presentation programs allow you to customize both design templates and design layouts. Hope this helps!
Please find full question attached
Answer and Explanation:
I will use Apple and HP in this comparison.Here I would compare Apple's laptop to that of Hewlet Packard as this is where they meet in the industry. Apple employs a strategy of differentiation and standing out in competition through their products. They aim to create products that are quite different and unique/innovative from other products in the market, and yet what the customer wants. In doing this, Apple has a trade-off for cost as they charge alot higher for their products than their competitors. HP on the other hand focus on making the best possible products that get the job done/meet the needs of customers while also being affordable. HP is more focused on affordable devices for their market and therefore have a different market segment for laptops from that of Apple. There is a trade-off for cost and market segment in this comparison
