<h2><em>A.</em></h2><h2><em>I believe is the answer</em></h2><h2><em>Hope this helps, sorry if not tho</em></h2>
Answer:
<h3 />
<h3>Following words have been edited in the passage :</h3>
<h3>On reaching his room he \Large{\bcancel{entire} \:entirely} </h3><h3>entire</h3><h3> entirely broke down, and became prey to the most violent \Large{\bcancel{agitation} \:agitations} </h3><h3>agitation</h3>
<h3> agitations .The vulgarity of those twins, and the gross materialism of Mrs. Otis,\Large{\bcancel{was} \:were} </h3><h3>was</h3><h3> were naturally extremely annoying, but what really \Large{\bcancel{distress} \:distressed} </h3><h3>distress</h3><h3> distressed him most was that he had been unable to wear the suit of mail.</h3>
The most basic difference<span> lies in their view of human nature. For </span>Hobbes<span>, humans are eager of power and under the state of nature we tend to kill each other. ... For </span>Locke<span>, the state of nature is not as pessimistic as </span>Hobbes<span>. We can colaborate, but the problem is in property.</span>
Since it lives in full light of the sun, it is considered luminous and shares characteristics with air and fire. Through its detachment from earth it represents spirit and soul. Dante has called the eagle of 'bird of God', while Jung defines it merely as height.
Answer:
Since both can fix the problems, essentially economic philosophies advocating public rather than private ownership, especially of the means of production,
Explanation:
production distribution