1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Scorpion4ik [409]
3 years ago
7

GIVING BRAINLIEST

History
1 answer:
Dima020 [189]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

Secured Loans

Explanation:

Hope this helps!

You might be interested in
Which state opposed a united Germany?<br><br> Austria<br> Russia<br> France<br> all of them
hram777 [196]

Answer:

France

Explanation:

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The rise of industry and growth in the Northeast offered the greatest benefit to people who owned their own businesses and
Kitty [74]
D) none of the above
5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
After his debates Lincoln became known as
pochemuha

Answer:

What is often overlooked is that the debates were part of a larger campaign, that they were designed to achieve certain immediate political objectives, and that they reflected the characteristics of mid-nineteenth-century political rhetoric. Douglas, a member of Congress since 1843 and a nationally prominent spokesman for the Democratic party, was seeking reelection to a third term in the U.S. Senate, and Lincoln was running for Douglas’s Senate seat as a Republican. Because of Douglas’s political stature, the campaign attracted national attention. Its outcome, it was thought, would determine the ability of the Democratic party to maintain unity in the face of the divisive sectional and slavery issues, and some were convinced it would determine the viability of the Union itself. “The battle of the Union is to be fought in Illinois,” a Washington paper declared.

Lincoln opened the campaign on an ominous note, warning that the agitation over slavery would not cease until a crisis had been passed that resulted either in the extension of slavery to all the territories and states or in its ultimate extinction. “A house divided against itself cannot stand,” he declared. Lincoln’s forecast was a statement of what would be known as the irrepressible conflict doctrine. The threat of slavery expansion, he believed, came not from the slaveholding South but from Douglas’s popular sovereignty position–allowing the territories to decide for themselves whether they wished to have slavery. Furthermore, Lincoln charged Douglas with conspiring to extend slavery to the free states as well as the territories, a false accusation that Douglas tried vainly to ignore. Fundamental to Lincoln’s argument was his conviction that slavery must be dealt with as a moral wrong. It violated the statement in the Declaration of Independence that all men are created equal, and it ran counter to the intentions of the Founding Fathers. The “real issue” in his contest with Douglas, Lincoln insisted, was the issue of right and wrong, and he charged that his opponent was trying to uphold a wrong. Only the power of the federal government, as exercised by Congress, could ultimately extinguish slavery. At the same time, Lincoln assured southerners that he had no intention of interfering with slavery in the states where it existed and assured northerners that he was opposed to the political and social equality of the races, points on which he and Douglas agreed.

Douglas rejected Lincoln’s notion of an irrepressible conflict and disagreed with his analysis of the intentions of the Founding Fathers, pointing out that many of them were slaveholders who believed that each community should decide the question for itself. A devoted Jacksonian, he insisted that power should reside at the local level and should reflect the wishes of the people. He was convinced, however, that slavery would be effectively restricted for economic, geographic, and demographic reasons and that the territories, if allowed to decide, would choose to be free. In an important statement at Freeport, he held that the people could keep slavery out of their territories, in spite of the Dred Scott decision, simply by withholding the protection of the local law. Douglas was disturbed by Lincoln’s effort to resolve a controversial moral question by political means, warning that it could lead to civil war. Finally, Douglas placed his disagreement with Lincoln on the level of republican ideology, arguing that the contest was between consolidation and confederation, or as he put it, “one consolidated empire” as proposed by Lincoln versus a “confederacy of sovereign and equal states” as he proposed.

On election day, the voters of Illinois chose members of the state legislature who in turn reelected Douglas to the Senate in January 1859. Although Lincoln lost, the Republicans received more popular votes than the Democrats, signaling an important shift in the political character of the state. Moreover, Lincoln had gained a reputation throughout the North. He was invited to campaign for Republican candidates in other states and was now mentioned as a candidate for the presidency. In winning, Douglas further alienated the Buchanan administration and the South, was soon to be stripped of his power in the Senate, and contributed to the division of the Democratic party.

DONT PUT ALL OF THIS JUST READ THOUE IT AND YOU WILL KNOW WHAT IS WAS KNOWN FOR! PLS MAKE MY BRAINLYEST PLS

8 0
2 years ago
When Avarham emigrated from Russia in the early 1900s, he changed his name to Abraham to sound more American. What is this an ex
defon
A assimilation he is assumeing a name of another country to fi tin
3 0
3 years ago
How did the case of Leo Frank lead to an increase in racial inequality in the South?
Mazyrski [523]

Answer: B. Southern leaders like Tom Watson began an anti-Semitic campaign against Jewish businesses.

Explanation:

Leo Frank was an American Jew who was accused of killing 13-year-old, Mary Phagan who worked in a plant in which he was the Superintendent. The case saw a lot of anti-Semitism spread across the United States especially in the South as people believed that the Jews wanted Leo Frank freed regardless of whether he was guilty or innocent.

Tom Watson was a Southern leader from Georgia where he was the editor of the Jeffersonian. In response to his political rival supporting Leo Frank, he unleased an anti-Semitic campaign and spoke against Jewish businesses and when Frank was imprisoned instead of executed, called for Frank to be lynched.

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • According to Locke when does a legislature or a government lost its right to rule
    13·2 answers
  • What are two affects of the Lewis and Clark Expedition
    13·1 answer
  • What geographic features affected the battle of yorktown
    6·1 answer
  • How did the fall of the soviet union effect ukraine
    11·1 answer
  • YucLUI (47 puisies)
    11·1 answer
  • Describe how one of Thomas Edison's inventions changed American life?
    10·1 answer
  • What was the highest social class in the new world
    13·1 answer
  • Which level of Georgia courts has jurisdiction over misdemeanor violations, including traffic cases?
    8·2 answers
  • HELP FASTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT
    6·2 answers
  • A hiking trail is 20 kilometers long
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!