yes I definitely affirm that the switch of Chrysler from LIFO to FIFO was beneficial to the stockholders mainly because the profit figure was increased.
In several ways, the change improved Chrysler's financial results in 1970. In addition to cutting the 1970s loss by $20 million, it improved Chrysler's working capital. The change also made the comparison with 1969 earnings appear slightly more favorable because, after restatement, Chrysler's 1969 profit was only raised by $ 10.2 million from the original figures.
Finally, the change aided Chrysler's balance sheet by increasing inventories and thus current assets by $150 million at the end of 1970 compared to LIFO. As Chrysler's profit has plummeted in the last two years and its financial position has tightened, auto analysts have been wary of the company's shrinking current asset to current liability ratio. Chrysler, on the other hand, paid to improve its balance sheet and results. The primary benefit of LIFO is that it reduces profit and thus tax liabilities.
Learn more about LIFO here:
brainly.com/question/15344569
#SPJ4
Answer:
Answer is option A, i.e. airlines would charge the same price to each type of flyer.
Explanation:
The elasticity of demand for air tickets by vacationers is generally found higher than that of business travelers. the reason behind this is that there is an ample amount of options as well as time in the hands of vacationers and which is not the case with the business travelers. Business travelers do not opt for other modes of transport other than the airway as this saves their time. Therefore, when one requires to create the same elasticity of demand for both types of flyers, then the prices for all of them should be kept the same.
Answer: (B). raises the quantity of labor supplied and reduces the quantity of labor demanded compared to the equilibrium level.
Explanation: When a minimum-wage law forces the wage to remain above the level that balances supply and demand, it raises the quantity of labor supplied and reduces the quantity of labor demanded compared to the equilibrium level.
Answer:
Hypertonic soil
Explanation:
In the case study, the young farmer added 60% more fertilizer believing that more fertilizer would simply cause the plants to grow faster. He thought that, since fertilizer helps plants grow, more fertilizer would simply accelerate the processes. He created, however, a hypertonic soil environment rich in potassium and phosphorous, causing the water to leave the corn cells to go to the soil (osmosis effect) leaving them to wither.
