These gains and losses may be described or classified as either operating or nonoperating, depending on their relation to an entity's major ongoing or central operations.
<h3>What does Conceptual Framework say about profit and loss?</h3>
- The Exposure Draft proposed that, because profit or loss is the primary source of information about an entity's financial performance for the period, the framework should include a presumption that all income and all expenses will be included in that statement.
- The FASB's conceptual framework classifies gains and losses based on whether they are related to an entity's major ongoing or central operations.
- Nonoperating are “other” gains and losses.
To learn more about Fasb gain and loss, refer
to brainly.com/question/24448358
#SPJ4
The implication of sharing confidential material information is about having to keep a certain thing private in a way that it should be remained secret and hidden unless it has been given consent by the person who holds the privacy to be told to another party. It is not release carelessly and should be handled with care as it should be kept by the person withholding the information.
The answer is lending your bestfriend 25 dollars to buy a guitar.
Unit of costs is the amount incurred by a particular company to be able to produce, store and sell the number of the same products. In the given example. 25 dollars is the cost of the guitar or the unit of costs.
About 30 to 45% of new products fail to deliver any meaningful financial return. This typically happens due to a number of reasons, from poor product / market fit, failure to understand customer needs (or fixing a non-existing problem), to a lack of internal capabilities.
Answer:
a. mostly cigarette buyers.
Explanation:
The law of demand states an inverse relationship between quantity demanded of a good and it's price, keeping other factors affecting demand as constant.
Price elasticity of demand refers to the degree of responsiveness of quantity demanded to a change in price.
Alcohol and cigarettes are exceptions to the law of demand since in their case, the factor of addiction presides which outweighs rational decision making.
Thus, price elasticity of demand of cigarettes is inelastic. So a marginally higher price charged for cigarettes will not reduce their consumption.
A new tax on cigarettes would raise their prices. The manufacturers, to cover such taxes and maintain the same margin as before would further raise the prices of cigarettes further.
Thus, the tax burden would be shifted to the consumers and hence majorly borne by them.
