1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
madreJ [45]
3 years ago
10

Square root of 115 115/11 and 10.5624 from least to greatest

Mathematics
1 answer:
Mrac [35]3 years ago
8 0
From least to greatest.  in this order  115/11  10.5624  115
You might be interested in
For the rational function f(x)= 5x3-x/2x3 , identify any removable discontinuities.
Ierofanga [76]

Answer:

Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s recent work is a near-solution to the Collatz Conjecture in some subtle ways. But his methods most likely can’t be adapted to yield a complete solution to the problem, as he subsequently explained. So we might be working on it for decades longer.

The Conjecture is in the math discipline known as Dynamical Systems, or the study of situations that change over time in semi-predictable ways. It looks like a simple, innocuous question, but that’s what makes it special. Why is such a basic question so hard to answer? It serves as a benchmark for our understanding; once we solve it, then we can proceed to much more complicated matters.

The study of dynamical systems could become more robust than anyone today could imagine. But we’ll need to solve the Collatz Conjecture for the subject to flourish.

Step-by-step explanation:

Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s recent work is a near-solution to the Collatz Conjecture in some subtle ways. But his methods most likely can’t be adapted to yield a complete solution to the problem, as he subsequently explained. So we might be working on it for decades longer.

The Conjecture is in the math discipline known as Dynamical Systems, or the study of situations that change over time in semi-predictable ways. It looks like a simple, innocuous question, but that’s what makes it special. Why is such a basic question so hard to answer? It serves as a benchmark for our understanding; once we solve it, then we can proceed to much more complicated matters.

The study of dynamical systems could become more robust than anyone today could imagine. But we’ll need to solve the Collatz Conjecture for the subject to flourish.Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s recent work is a near-solution to the Collatz Conjecture in some subtle ways. But his methods most likely can’t be adapted to yield a complete solution to the problem, as he subsequently explained. So we might be working on it for decades longer.

The Conjecture is in the math discipline known as Dynamical Systems, or the study of situations that change over time in semi-predictable ways. It looks like a simple, innocuous question, but that’s what makes it special. Why is such a basic question so hard to answer? It serves as a benchmark for our understanding; once we solve it, then we can proceed to much more complicated matters.

The study of dynamical systems could become more robust than anyone today could imagine. But we’ll need to solve the Collatz Conjecture for the subject to flourish.Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s rece

3 0
3 years ago
In right triangle KLM, KL =14 and angle L=30° and angle M=90°. Find KM. Leave your answer in the simplest radical form.
salantis [7]

Answer:

KM = 7 Units

Step-by-step explanation:

In the given structure ΔKLM

∠KLM = 30° and side KL = 14 and ∠KML = 90°

and we have to find the measurement of KM.

From right angle triangle KLM

Side Sin30° = KM/KL = KM/14

KM = 14×sin30° = 14×1/2 = 7

So the answer is KM = 7 Units

5 0
3 years ago
Please help, im trying get my grade up to go on a date w my bf
Inga [223]

Answer:

a+4b-24

Step-by-step explanation:

You have to multiply the entire equation by 4, which get you a+4b-24

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A water tank is 3/4 full.
guapka [62]

x/.75=x-56/0.4

0.4x=.75x-42

-0.35x=-42

x=120

I set up a proportion in which x=the tank when it is 3/4 full. When the tank is 3/4 full, solving the proportion tells us the x=120 litres. 120/3=40, and 120+40 is 160, showing that a tank completely full would indeed hold 160 litres.

Hope this helps!

3 0
3 years ago
Translate the sentence into an inequality.<br> The sum of 3 and c is less than -29.
Solnce55 [7]

Answer:

3+c < -29 or c+3 < -29 because of communitive property

Step-by-step explanation:

First, the sum means addition, you could write 3+c or c+3 because addition is communitive property.

Then the sum is less than -29 so we need to use the less than symbol which is this symbol: <  

Now write the inequality! 3+c < -29

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Evaluate 12 − 6 + (14 − 8)2 = ____________. (1 point)
    8·2 answers
  • In triangle rst, rs=x+7, rt=2x-3, and st=x+7. If the perimeter is 32, find the value of x and classify the triangle by its sides
    6·2 answers
  • For each line there is one and only one line segment?<br> True?<br> or<br> False?
    12·1 answer
  • Hello mee need help I’m going to get a whooping because I’m failing.
    12·2 answers
  • Trevor is painting a mural on a 1-square-meter section of a wall. He has completed a rectangular part of the mural that is 34 me
    11·1 answer
  • Which expression shows the quotient of a number n and 4?<br><br>a.4n<br>b.n-4<br>c.n÷4<br>d.n+4​
    15·2 answers
  • 1.6y+y-4/15y+1 1/6y=2 1/3
    13·1 answer
  • Which one of the following would prove that two triangles are congruenta
    13·1 answer
  • Choose the number that is less than:3.15 x 10A.1.11 x 10B.9.9 x 10C.36,500D.3.26 x 10
    13·1 answer
  • Solve the following inequality. 3x - 4 &gt; 11
    8·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!