The answer is C.
Since here taxable income is over $77,100 and below $160,850, her tax is $15,698.75 + [.28*($95,000 - $77,100)].
Tax = $15,698.75 + [.28*($17,900)]<span>.
= </span>$15,698.75 + [$5012]<span>.
=</span><span> $</span><span>20,710.75
Thank you for posting this question. Please feel free to ask me more.</span>
There are multiple answers to this question
Answers: 3.161, 3.162, 3.163, 3.164, 3.165, 3.166, 3.167, 3.168, 3.169
(You can just pick one)
Reason: just look at the place numbers. The number has to be between 3.16 and 3.17. So go to the next place value which is the thousandths place. 3.161-3.169 all are between since they have a 6 in the hundredths place, but does not go over 1.17
D
is certainly wrong. You could extend the length of AD as far as you want and the two triangles (ABD and ACD) would still be congruent.
C
is wrong as well. The triangles might be similar, but they are more. They are congruent.
B
You don't have to prove that. It is given on the way the diagram is marked.
A
A is your answer. The two triangles are congruent by SAS
Answer:
Its A because when you do (x-5)=0 you add 5 to get x=5 and thats your x value and the 3 for your k is your y value
