Answer: The pundit is using a NATIONAL DEFENSE ARGUMENT to justify the trade restriction.
Explanation: National defense argument is when someone is using the security of the nation to defend his argument, to be very important as the security of the nation is very important.
This type of argument always tends to use the fallacy of red herring to convince his audience about his argument. The argument sounds to be important as it used red herring to relate it's point to the security of the nation during wartime.
The pundit politician has used the fallacy of red herring to relate it's reason of increment in the tariff of semiconductor importation, to the security of the nation during war times. Therefore this is a national security argument.
Farms stayed small with only family to help run them.
Answer:
Because slave owners didn't want them to know how to read or write because they can use that to escape, an example is they can make a fake letter saying that they are free and is not owned.
Explanation:
The only forensic evidence that experts agree to be 100
percent accurate would be the crime being
committed in court, in front of the judge and jury.
I am hoping that this answer has
satisfied your query and it will be able to help you in your endeavor, and if
you would like, feel free to ask another question.
