Answer:
D) The extra energy benefits Patrick gets from another can are no longer worth the cost. MB/MC (S)
Explanation:
The optimal quantity for Patrick to consume is 5 cans of GreenCow.
This is the quantity where MARGINAL BENEFIT EQUALS MARGINAL COST. For all quantities up to the 5th, the marginal benefit is higher than the marginal cost. This means that Patrick's net benefit is increasing, and consuming all units up to this point make him better off.
If Patrick were to consume any more than 5 cans of GreenCow, the cost of each additional can would be higher than the additional benefit (because the marginal cost curve is higher than the marginal benefit curve). Consuming any cans beyond the 5th, therefore, makes him worse off.
I believe the answer is: <span>the allocation method
production possibilities graph could only include the factors that can be projected after doing combination of various products' production.
Allocation method only play role in the technique that can be used to produce the products and cannot be considered as data projection from the production
</span>
Answer:
Risk free interest rate is 5%
Y is 15.5% at a Beta of 1.5
X is 0.29 when Y is 7%
Explanation:
Risk free interest is 0.05 which 5% as given in the equation
The average expected return is given by Y
Y=0.05+0.07X
Since Beta is the same as X, when equals 1.5,Y is calculated thus
Y=0.05+0.07(1.5)
Y=0.05+0.105
Y=0.155
Y=15.5%
The value of Beta at an average return of 7% is computed thus:
7%=0.05+0.07X
where X is the unknown
0.07=0.05+0.07X
0.07-0.05=0.07X
0.02=0.07X
X=0.02/0.07
X=0.29
The scenario illustrates that the Beta, which is the risk of investment and the Y , the expected average return are positively correlated.
Answer:
4%
Explanation:
If the real gross domestic product for the year grew by 2%
The inflation rate also grew by 2%
Then nominal GDP rate can be calculated as follows
= Real GDP + inflation rate
= 2% + 2%
= 4%
Hence the nominal gross domestic product grew by 4%
Answer and Explanation:
The computation of the payback period for each investment is shown below;
For Option 1
= Initial Investment ÷ Annual Cash Flow
= $280,000 ÷ $134,569
= 2.081 Year
Here Annual cash inflow is
= Net income + Depreciation
= $80,769 + (($280,000 - $11,000) ÷ 5)
= $134,569
For Option-2
= Initial Investment ÷ Annual Cash Flow
= $200,000 ÷ $70,429
= 2.84 Year
Here Annual cash inflow is
= Net income + Depreciation
= $44,000 + (($200,000 - $15,000) ÷ 7)
= $70,429