3/5 is greater than 1/4 and if u dont trust me then look at a graph
Answer:
23+4x=87 x=16
Step-by-step explanation: 16 weeks he has to save up.
Answer:
73384 kilotons
Step-by-step explanation:
=> Total amount the 1st year = 90,000
=> Since after the 1st yr, there was a reduction of 4%, so 100% - 4% = 96% or 0.96
=> Total time = 6
We know that the formula of a geometric sequence is;
aₙ = a₁ * r⁽ⁿ⁻¹⁾
In which;
- aₙ = the value that has to be figured out (in this case it would be a₆)
- a₁ = the first term of the sequence (in this case it would be 90,000)
- r = common ration (in this case it would be 0.96)
- n = given time (in this case it would be 6)
Therefore we can finally say;
=> aₙ = a₁ * r⁽ⁿ⁻¹⁾
=> a₆ = 90,000 * 0.96⁶⁻¹
=> a₆ = 90,000 * 0.96⁵
=> a₆ = 73383.54
=> a₆ = 73384 (Rounded to the nearest whole number)
Therefore, rounding the answer to the nearest whole number, the answer would be; 73384 kilotons
Hope this helps! (Btw big shout out to jcherry99 for helping me figure this out!!)
Explanation:
Any calibration scale consists of markings indicating calibrated values. The ‘space’ between the marks (lines) is the area of uncertainty with respect to the calibration.
Thus, the possible error is always one-half of the value between the markings, because ON either one you have a calibrated value. In between, no matter how close you think you can “judge” the distance, there is no calibrated reference point, so the ‘error’ of stating a value is +/- the value of half of the calibration accuracy. 0.991 is accurate (assuming that is the calibration limit), and 0.992 or 0.990 would also be “accurate”. The possible error is the +/- 0.0005 beyond that third digit that might be more to one side or the other.
That means the measured value of 0.991g could be between 0.9905g and 0.9915g.
9,000 * 3% = 270
So it would be $270 in sales tax
