Answer:
The summary of the accident, calculate the total dollar value of the property damage Stephanie caused is explained below in detail.
Explanation:
The term 100/300/100 coverage indicates that a character has coverage of $100,000 physical damage mortgage coverage per person, $300,000 total physical damage mortgage insurance per accident, and $100,000 property loss accountability per accident.
So, in case Stephanie prompted a property and accident destruction, then $1,00000 will be sustained by the insurance corporation and above this value, it will be paid by Stephanie.
Answer:
Office building
Explanation:
The formula to compute the return on investment is shown below:
Return on investment = Operating Income ÷ Average Operating Assets
It is a mix of operating income and the average operating assets through the return on investment could be computed
Since the return on investment is already given in the question
And, the higher return on investment is the best one for property use
So the office building has a higher return on investment i.e 13.5% which reflects the best for property usage.
ZERO amount would the insurance company pay for vandalism that does $425 of damage to a home if the insured homeowner has a $500 deductible.
( Because the deductible exceeds the loss or the damage. The loss is $425 and the deductible is $ 500, so here the deductible exceeds the loss hence the insurance company will not pay anything).
People like you pay premiums to insurance companies to cover potential losses related to their property. Insurance companies receive these premiums and aggregate them into money pools. These funds are available to cover losses incurred by pool members.
When you report a car accident to the insurance company, the insurance company will send an adjuster to assess the damage. The expert's first task is to decide whether to classify the vehicle as a total loss. Assuming the vehicle is a total loss, the expert performs a valuation and assigns a value to the vehicle.
Learn more about vandalism at
brainly.com/question/13646632
#SPJ4
Answer:
B. structural unemployment will exist in an economy that is innovative
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that the relevant issue he is ignoring is that structural unemployment will exist in an economy that is innovative. This is because innovative economies tend to constantly be going through industrial change to implement the new innovations, this causes a need for only individuals that are specifically skilled and leaving unemployed the people who are not.
Answer:
a. $103,400
Explanation:
As we know that
Cost of goods sold = Beginning inventory + purchases - ending inventory
And,
Gross profit = Sales revenue - cost of goods sold
Since in the question it is given that
The ending inventory and beginning inventory had been overstated by $11,200 and $6,600 respectively
Since overstatement in the initial inventory raises the cost of the goods sold and decreases by that amount the gross profit & net income
And, overstatement in ending inventory reduced cost of goods sold and raised gross profit & net income by that amount.
So for overstated ending inventory the amount should be deducted and for overstated beginning inventory the condition would be reverse
So, the correct amount is
= incorrect pretax net income + overstatement in beginning inventory - overstatement in ending inventory
= $108,000 + $6,600 - $11,200
= $103,400
