<u>Explanation:</u>
Using the Miranda v. Arizona case as an example, we need to remember that M.r Mirinda was charged with sexual assault and kidnapping; which are part of the important issues society tries to avoid
In other words, he went against these important values and goals of society. Hence, there must be a balance between the right against self-incrimination and the right to counsel over breaking other laws in the constitution.
Raging, issues, they mentally need help, or maybe they just need to start working on a better schedule
Answer:
Yes i think this is right. Many successful criminal prosecutions in the United States end not with jury trials. Instead this gives a defendant a chance for a shorter sentence, especially if the defendant is not guilty. Agreeing to plead guilty to some or all of the charges against them in exchange for concessions from the prosecutors. These agreements allow prosecutors to focus their time and resources on other cases, and reduce the number of trials that judges need to oversee.
Explanation:
<em>None Needed</em>
Answer:
Explanation:
I believe this question comes down to your opinion.
If I were asked though, I would pick democracy. It's pretty easy to explain.
I would pick democracy, because that makes the rulles of the country elected by the people. :)
hope this helped!
