<span>Put all of these numbers in a line...obviously, don't put ALL of them, but enough so you can see what you're doing.
1 + 2 + 3 + ... + 297,624,985
Now put all these numbers BACKWARDS underneath that.
1 + 2 + 3 + ... + 297,624,985
297,624,985 + 297,624,984 + 297,624,983 + ... + 1
Now add the first series to the second, and you'll see that they add up to:
297,624,986 + 297,624,986 + 297,624,986 + ...297,624,986
Since there were 297,624,985 terms, the total sum here is
297,624,986 * 297,624,985
But since you added it twice, you divide it by two:
148,812,493 * 297,624,985
This is 44,290,315,996,937,605, so...yes, it is MUCH larger.</span>
Answer:
151.05 euro
Explanation:
The computation is shown below:
Data provided in the question
€1 = $1.1364
$1 = $1.2408
And the new coat cost is $213 in Singapore
So, by considering the above information
The 1 euro = $1.1364 × $1.2408 = $1.4100512
So,
$1 = 1 ÷ $1.4100512 euro = 0.709194
So, the identical coat cost is
= $213 × 0.709194
= 151.05 euro
Answer:
A) $56,750
Explanation:
Since Manning's ownership changed during the year, it must allocate income differently for the first 40 days than the remaining 325.
Kane should report the following income:
- 100% income form Manning x 40/365 = $73,000 x 40/365 = $8,000
- 75% income from Manning x 325/365 = $73,000 x 75% x 325/365 = $48,750
- total income allocated to Kane = $8,000 + $48,750 = $56,750
Answer:
trade unions
Explanation:
as they ensure to protect employees rather than customers.
"Sweater" is the factor that is most likely influencing the decision to wait because it probably isn't cold enough for a sweater yet (I think?)
