The SCOTUS did not rule that T.L.O’s 4th amendment (searches and seizures) rights had been violated. They ruled that the school administrations search of the bag was reasonable under the circumstances (i.e T.L.O. Being a minor and on school property, meaning that while at school, administration is responsible for the well-being and safety of all students, thus allowing them to search T.L.O’s bag for marijuana). A good way to think of it is that while you’re at school, the administration acts as your parents. Your parents don’t need a warrant to search through your room and neither does the administration if you are on school property. The 4th amendment applies to this case because it protects against unlawful searches and seizures (i.e. searches and seizures that are without a warrant). The constitutional question was whether or not T.L.O. Could be charged with a crime/punished or not because the school administration did not have a warrant. However, because the school administration was acting as a loco parentis (latin term for “in place of the parent”) they did not need a warrant to search her bag. Hope this helped!
The answer is between 2-4 so two because the icu is the intensive care unit which is serious
A domestic LLC or corporation is a business that is formed within its home (domestic) state. Foreign qualification is when a legal entity conducts business in a state or jurisdiction other than the one in which it was originally formed. (It is not to be confused with being a business in a foreign country.
Answer:
Yes
Explanation:
Yes, you can hit them back as you have ‘Right to Private Defense’ provided there is a proportionality of force. The right to private defense is the right to protect oneself from the unlawful aggression of others. It is based on the cardinal principle that it is the first duty of a man to help him even by taking the law into his own hand.
