Answer:
In the understanding of this court case, where the plaintiff (L.M.) filed a lawsuit against Pacheco on sexual abuse, the court ruled that the perpetration of the abhorrent act committed did not have to do with Pacheco´s ´´scope of employment´´ as the act happened outside the boundaries of the church and not within his working hours. However, if the plaintiff were to argue that in fact this conduct happened within the scope of employment, she would have to explain and convince that Pacheco was indeed responsible as it is a Pastor's duty and responsibility to guide and counsel at all hours, and not just limited to his church´s hours. A pastor is a figure of responsibility as a visible head for a community, not to mention that in some churches, a pastor is also a legal representative.
Employers should be held liable for the acts of their employees whenever there is a failure to supervise employees or some kind of misdemeanor is perpetrated within the employer´s work facilities or influential premises. These points of view however, are not stated by a lawyer/judicially, these are my personal observations after having researched on the case.
Answer: do not place subjects in legal jeopardy
Explanation:
An ethical principle is a base philosophical stance which directly or indirectly leads to an ethical standard. The word “ethics” simply means “moral principles that govern a person's or group's behavior.” .An ethical principal is the foundation thought or idea that makes an ethical standard correct.
New york to Portugal takes approximately <span>3,393 miles.</span><span>
</span><span>Venezulela to Portugal takes approximately 4, 262 miles.
Hence, the farthest would be Venezuela to Portugal. </span>
Answer:
.........mmmmnnnn........