Answer:
b. informational social influence
Explanation:
Informational social influence is a psychological or social phenomenon that describes the tendency of an individual to accept the information of others we consider accurate and correct most especially when faced with ambiguity or obscurity. We simply conform to the opinions of others we believe have an accurate information we seem not to have. In such situation, we simply conform to what they are doing because we believe they are right.
When participants in an experiment conform to others' answers as explained in the scenario given in the question, we can infer that it best illustrates the <em>impact of informational social influence</em> rather than influence from peers.
This would be a perfect example of whistle-blowing.
Whistle-blowing is an act of exposing the corrupt, illegal or even unethical practices, conducts and activities of the organization, either public or private, by an individual who is an employee of the the said organization. The person doing the act is called a whistleblower. They do this by either presenting the evidence to the higher ups or to the law enforcing agencies. The press is also an option.
By scheduling 30 to 60 minutes every night in order to review her course material, what Amarah is doing is called distributed practice.
In this situation, she distributes her studying into many sessions of 30 to 60 minutes. This is also called spaced learning.
Distributed practice can be described as a studying technique that is opposed to cramming where one struggles to retain a lot in a short while.
Read more on brainly.com/question/14445758?referrer=searchResults
Answer:
Wear goggles
wash your hands
follow directions
don't fool around
Explanation:
Someone keeps deleting my answer to this!
