All categories

3 years ago

Which definition best explains the Big Bang theory?

Physics

2 answers:

Mariulka [41]3 years ago

4 0

A
It’s called the Big Bang

goblinko [34]3 years ago

3 0

Answer:

probably a

Explanation:

I think that's what it is

You might be interested in

Which type of evidence was used to tie Ted Bundy to the murder of Lisa Levy?

Elodia [21]

Explanation:

identified by one of the Chi Omega survivors as the assailant, and hair and fiber evidence tied him to the Leach murder. His trial for the Florida attacks in June 1979 was the first-ever nationally televised trial in the United States.

6 0

2 years ago

block of mass m sits at rest on a rough inclined ramp that makes an angle with the horizontal. What must be true about normal fo

oee [108]

Answer:

Explanation:

For a body on a ramp with mass m, the forces acting on the body along the vertical component are the weight and the normal reaction.

The weight of the body acts in the negative y direction while the normal reaction acts in the positive y direction

Taking the sum of forces along the y component

Sum Fy = -W+R = ma

Since acceleration is zero

-W+R = m(0)

-W+R = 0

-W = -R

W = R

Hence the Normal reaction force acting on the on the body is equal to normal force

6 0

3 years ago

An amount of energy is added to ice, raising its temperature from -10Â°C to -5Â°C. A larger amount of energy is added to the sam

lara [203]

Answer:

The correct option is;

B) The specific heat of ice is less than that of water.

Explanation:

Here we have

Let the amount of energy added to the ice at -10 C to raise the temperature to -5 C be X J

Let the amount of energy added to the water at 15 C to raise the temperature to 20 C be Y J

We know that the heat required, ΔQ to raise the temperature of a substance is given by

ΔQ = m·c·Δθ

Where:

m = Mass of the substance

c = Specific heat capacity

Δθ = Temperature change

Since the mass of the ice and the water are the same, so also is the change in temperature, (-5 - (-10) = 5 and 20 - 15 = 5) we have

for m₂·c₂·Δθ₂ > m₁·c₁·Δθ₁

Where:

m₁, c₁, Δθ₁, is for the ice and m₂, c₂, Δθ₂ is for the water and

m₁ = m₂

Δθ₁ = Δθ₂

Therefore,

c₂ > c₁ = c₁ < c₂

That is the specific heat capacity of the ice is lesser than the specific heat capacity of the water.

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

A slingshot can project a pebble at a speed as high as 38.0 m/s. (a) If air resistance can be ignored, how high (in m) would a p

kipiarov [429]

Answer:

73.67 m

Explanation:

If projected straight up, we can work in 1 dimension, and we can use the following kinematic equations:

$y(t) = y_0 + V_0 * t + \frac{1}{2} a t^2$

$V(t) = V_0 + a * t$ ,

Where $y_0$ its our initial height, $V_0$ our initial speed, a the acceleration and t the time that has passed.

For our problem, the initial height its 0 meters, our initial speed its 38.0 m/s, the acceleration its the gravitational one ( g = 9.8 m/s^2), and the time its uknown.

We can plug this values in our equations, to obtain:

$y(t) = 38 \frac{m}{s} * t - \frac{1}{2} g t^2$