The Anthropological perspectives on participation in CBPR: Insights from the water project, Maras, Peru is given below.
<h3>What is the Anthropological perspectives?</h3>
Elizabeth Cartwright was said to have written an article as she anthropologically explore an aspect of the process of Community-Based Participatory Research (CBPR) which is known as participation.
Note that Participation in CBPR is said to be often conceptualized as, community members are known to be very much involved in the research methods.
Hence the study was said to have focused on viewing participation as of less attribute in terms of quantity and also more on quality of the relationship that exist between community members and researchers;
Hence via the use of an ongoing "Water Project" in the area of Peruvian Andes, she and her crew explore the ways that interaction, as a kind of participative act forms the space for participating and also of imagining.
Citation:
Cartwright E, Schow D. (2016). Anthropological Perspectives on Participation in CBPR: Insights From the Water Project, Maras, Peru. Qual Health Res. 2016 Jan;26(1):136-40. doi: 10.1177/1049732315617480. Epub 2015 Nov 27. PMID: 26613969.
Learn more about Participation from
brainly.com/question/1323955
#SPJ1
<span>Attribution errors fall into four main classes i.e
i. Fundamental attribution error where we explain the behavior of another person by emphasizing the role of dispositional factors and minimize the role of situational factors e.g. assuming that a football team loses a match because they are useless and not because they are jetlagged and tired from a long flight .
ii) Actor-observor bias. Here we maximize the effect of dispositional factors in others' behavior whilst minimizing the effect of situational factors. We also go on to minimize the effect of dispositional factors on our own behavior while maximizing the effect of situational factors. e.g when one says a coworker fails to complete a task because they are lazy but when that same individual fails to complete an assingment they attrubute it to unrealistic deadlines.
iii) Self-serving bias. Here a person tends to take responsibility for success and blames failure on external factors e.g you win at poker because you are a good player but when you lose it is because the deck is stacked.
iv) Hostile attribution bias. When we interpret the actions of others as hostile even without evidence to dispute the benignity of the same. e.g. when you assume that two whispering strangers are talking ill about you ignoring the fact that in all likelihood they are simply having a private conversation.
In the given example winning at poker and explaining that you are good at cards and have good luck is self-serving bias. The results of the success at the card game is attributed to the victor's playing prowess as well as possession of good fortune. When losing this individual would likely blame it on "bad luck" and not on the skills of the competitors.</span>
I think the correct answer from the choices listed above is option C. At railroad crossings, you must stop at least 20 feet <span>from the nearest rail if a flagger is warning of an oncoming train. Hope this answers the question. Have a nice day.</span>
This would be known as self competency. I think as it <span>includes the knowledge, skills, and abilities to assess your own strengths and weaknesses, set and pursue professional and personal goals, balance work and personal life, and engage in new learning which includes new or modified skills, behaviors, and attitudes.</span>