Answer:
The Fifth Amendment says to the federal government that no one shall be "deprived of life, liberty or property without due process of law."
The Sixth Amendment guarantees the rights of criminal defendants, including the right to a public trial without unnecessary delay, the right to a lawyer, the right to an impartial jury, and the right to know who your accusers are and the nature of the charges and evidence against you.
Explanation:
Answer:
Popular Sovereignty.
Explanation:
The principle of popular sovereignty state that it is the consent of the people that creates and sustains the state and its government through the elected representatives.
The people are source of all political power. this principle is associated with Thomas Hobbs, Rousseau and John Locke, all three were social contract philosophers. Declaration of independence also reflects this principle because it declare that it is the prole who instituted the government for themselves and it derives power from their consent.
If the police had no warrant saying they could go in or search Joe's house then the police could be in a certain amount of trouble as well seeing as Joe did not willingly let them in and they never had a warrant but Joe could be in a lot more trouble for being in the possession of drugs.
And smart homes should be more advanced to these kinds of things because they could have been fake cops, plus they had no warrant which leaves everyone in this situation at fault especially Joe for being in the possession of drugs and the possible false 911 call influenced on drugs either making him see things or think things, maybe even both.
Answer:
Bounty collectors hunt them down
Explanation:
If someone tries to escape from a on going trial, the court has a "police force" they're not exactly police. but they are called "Bounty Hunters" And they capture escaped people.
Answer:
The difference is that Justification is a social Defense and a Excuse Defense is a mental disorder or something physical wrong with them
Explanation:
Excuse defence is when the defendant admits to committing a criminal act but believes that he or she cannot be held responsible because there was no criminal intent. Excuse defences that are used in courts today are; Age, Mental Disorder, Automatism, Mistake of Fact and Mistake of Law.
Justification is a defense in a criminal case, by which a defendant who committed the crime as defined, claims they did no wrong, because committing the crime advanced some social interest or vindicated a right of such importance that it outweighs the wrongfulness of the crime.
