To prevent monopolies. The law was also created to make competition in the market place.
Answer:
Here all of these options are wrong , the correct answer is regardless of how the tax is levied the burden of tax would be shared by both the seller and buyer.
Explanation:
Tax can be said as primary source of income for the government. When a tax is levied on the goods , the burden of that would have to be bear by both buyer and seller , irrelevant of how that levied . If the taxes are high then the demand by buyer would be less and seller would receive low price because less people would buy and n the case where taxes are low demand would be high and seller would receive high prices ,in both cases tax would be levied on both seller and buyer and how much it would be depends upon the elasticity of demand and supply. So all the statements given here are false or invalid.
Answer:
In the given year, American population grew by 4% while China's population grew by 1.2%.
Explanation:
The present problem establishes that in one year the populations of China and the United States both increased by 12 million people. But both countries have different populations: China has a population of 1 billion inhabitants, while the United States has 300 million.
To determine the percentage of population increase in each country, we must perform cross multiplications:
-U.S:
300 = 100
12 = X
(12 x 100) / 300 = X
1,200 / 300 = X
4 = X
The United States grew by population 4% in the year.
-China:
1,000 = 100
12 = X
(12 x 100) / 1,000 = X
1,200 / 1,000 = X
1.2 = X
China grew by population 1.2% in the same period of time.
Plz post a photo or answer choices of the problem
Answer:
Monopolist can charge a higher price from women.
Explanation:
A monopolist is producing 100,000 units of a product.
The price of the product is $5 per unit.
The price elasticity of demand for men at this price is -3.5.
The price elasticity for women, on the other hand, is -0.8.
This means that the men have a relatively elastic demand for the product. While on the other hand, women have relatively inelastic demand. This implies that if the price is increased the demand from women will not change by a greater proportion.
While demand from men can change to a greater proportion because of a change in price.
In this situation, the firm can charge a higher price from women. This is an example of third-degree price discrimination.
