Answer and Explanation:
Given that this is a second price bid auction whereby the second highest bid is the price that the highest bidder pays for the item up for auction sale, so that b1>b2 then b1 gets item for the price of b2.
Truthfulness of true value is the dominant strategy here which means each player should aim to be truthful with their bid regarding their true value regardless of what other bidders are bidding. Therefore truthfulness of value is the optimal strategy with the best payoff for bidders
Answer:
Consider the following explanation
Explanation:
The discussion started with Mr. Friedman explaining how the want and setting up on MNCs have become way more easier than it was a couple of decades ago. This is because the role of business in the society has increases. With increasing population the demand needs to be met on that level as well. Agreeing with the latter point Mr. Karthik said that yes, the demand needs to met but that should not make MNC and their setup easy. The quality according to him suffers.
Mr.Karthik said that the MNCs are also huge retail shops who must make sure that their production of goods and services are worth opting for. This is actually what business is supposed to do. Unlike the two gentlemen who are busy taking out the judgement on what is right and wrong in business and role it plays in the society, Mr.SInger started to add an important aspect. According to his view the greater role of business today, lies in the fact that it must benefit the society and reap positive externalities.
This is where the Corporate social responsibility comes in. The usage of resources and then replenishing it back into the nature is very very important according to Mr.Singer. He explained why the industries should not be given the liberty to discharge waste anywhere but must be either penalised or made to indulge in the act of social responsibility. With such conclusive thought s all th three agreed on a larger perspective of business.
<span>Decrease by $57,400 per month.
Looks look at the cash flow for continuing to produce product a and discontinuing product a.
Continuing to produce
Income = 15900 * $29 = $461,100
Variable Expenses = 15900 * 23 = $365,700
Fixed overhead = $109,000
Total cash flow = $461,100 - $365,700 - $109,000 = -$13,600
So the Lusk company is losing $13,600 per month while producing product a. Let's see what happens if they stop producing it.
Income = $0
Variable Expenses = $0
Fixed overhead = $71,000
Total cash flow = $0 - $71,000 = -$71,000
So if they stop producing it, their fixed overhead decreases, but is still at $71,000 per month, for a total loss per month of $71,000.
The conclusion is to either lose $13,600 per month, or $71,000 per month. So if they stop production of product a, their loss per month will increase by $57,400.</span>
The selling price of the price that is offered to the buyer of the goods. The selling price of the car should be $<u><em>75,000</em></u>.
<h3>What is the selling price?</h3>
The selling price is the ultimate value of the goods the seller is willing to offer to the buyer at the time of sale. It is determined by adding up the profit margin to the actual cost of the goods.
The computation of the selling price of the car:
Given,
- Cost price =$60,000
- Margin =25%
Therefore, if Sherry wants to make 25% on the sale of each car then the car must be sold at $75,000 each.
Learn more about selling price, here:
brainly.com/question/3798799
