Answer:
Oral contracts regarding the sale of real property are enforceable under the Statute of Frauds.
Explanation:
Another thing that supports Donna's case is that she spent money, time and possibly others resources remodeling the house because she relied on the validity of the oral contract.
Answer:
The statement is not an express warranty, because it doesn't involve a negotiation of terms between Salazar and Mitsubishi. It is an employee of the company that imploy Salazar to bring the car should the car gives problem, and didn't involve an agreement between the two parties ( Salazar and Mitsubishi)
Explanation:
What is express warranty?
An express warranty arises from the parties’ negotiations in a sales transaction. Express warranties are often included in the written terms of a contract. An “express” warranty by a seller is created by:
Any statement of fact or promise relating to the goods sold which becomes part of the basis of the bargain between the parties, creating a warranty that the goods will conform to the statement or promise.
Any description of the goods sold which becomes part of the basis of the bargain between the parties, creating a warranty that the goods will conform to the description.
Any sample or model, which becomes part of the basis of the bargain between the parties, creating a warranty that the goods will conform to the sample or model.
An express warranty may be created even if the seller does not use formal words such as “warranty” or “guarantee,” and even if the seller does not have a specific intention to make a warranty. However, an express warranty is not created merely because the seller makes a statement as to the value of the goods, or as to seller’s opinion of the goods. Generally, statements made by a seller during the course of contract negotiations are treated as statements of fact, unless it can be shown that the buyer could only have reasonably considered the statement to be an opinion.
Answer:
A strictly dominant action produces: a higher payoff than any other action the player can use for every possible action of the other players.
Explanation:
A strictly dominant action does not play fair. Here, there is no equality because strict dominance requires all payoffs to be strictly greater.
A strictly dominant strategy is that strategy that always provides greater utility to a the player, no matter what the other player's strategy is.
A rational player will avoid a strictly dominated counterpart because if his opponent uses strictly dominated action he will be come out worse off regardless of which moves other players make.
See the formula of the future value of annuity ordinary through Google
Solve for PMT
PMT=10,000,000÷(((1+0.09)^(10)
−1)÷(0.09))=658,200.89
CARICOM or the <span>Caribbean
Community and Common Market solely reason for existence is to promote the
economic integration to guarantee the benefits and shared equitably.
The mainly cause for CARICOM in producing limited improvements is because
majority of the English speaking country
illustrates the division </span><span>deep
linguistic in Caribbean </span>
