Chemical potential energy

60g after 3 hours, 30g after 6 hours and 15g after 9 hours
Explanation:
Weight of the radioactive sample = 120g
half life time period = 3 hours
(a) The weight of sample after 3 hours

The fraction of sample left

Mass of the sample left

<u>6</u><u>0</u><u>g</u><u> </u><u>of</u><u> </u><u>sample</u><u> </u><u>is</u><u> </u><u>left</u><u> </u><u>after</u><u> </u><u>3</u><u> </u><u>hours</u>
(b) The weight of sample after 6 hours

The fraction of the sample left

Mass of the sample left

<u>3</u><u>0</u><u>g</u><u> </u><u>of</u><u> </u><u>sample</u><u> </u><u>is</u><u> </u><u>left</u><u> </u><u>after</u><u> </u><u>6</u><u> </u><u>hours</u>
(c) The weight of sample after 9 hours

The fraction of sample left

Mass of sample left

<u>1</u><u>5</u><u>g</u><u> </u><u>of</u><u> </u><u>sample</u><u> </u><u>is</u><u> </u><u>left</u><u> </u><u>after</u><u> </u><u>9</u><u> </u><u>hours</u><u>.</u>
<span>Two scientists wrote a paper detailing their research and conclusions and submitted it to a scientific journal. Several months later, they received the paper back from the publisher with many comments attached from several fellow scientists. It is either that they revise their study or replicate the study. Most scientists would revisit their work and the findings they had from their research. Most probable if they were successful and the comments of the publisher and the co-scientists were positive they could replicate the study to validate its accountability.<span>
</span></span>
Answer:
hydrogen (H), nitogen (N), oxygen (O), fluorine (F), chlorine (Cl), helium (He), neon (Ne), argon (Ar), krypton (Kr), xenon (Xe), radon (Rn)
Explanation: found this online, it's best to remember them.