Answer:
ISSUE Whether flag burning constitutes "symbolic speech" protected by the First Amendment. RULING Yes. REASONING (5-4) The majority of the Court, according to Justice William Brennan, agreed with Johnson and held that flag burning constitutes a form of "symbolic speech" that is protected by the First Amendment.
Explanation:
Texas v. Johnson, 491 U.S. 397 (1989), was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States that invalidated prohibitions on desecrating the American flag enforced in 48 of the 50 states.
<u>Answer</u>:
The East Coast is far from a convergent plate boundary that is why the east coast beaches in the US are Wider and sandier in general than the west coast beaches.
<u>Explanation</u>:
When the waves approach an irregular shoreline, they speed and break, they hit the points, and slowdown in the beaches that are quiet. Waves behave similarly in east coast causing them to be sandier.
Also, the east coast is far from convergent plate boundary., i.e.: place where 'tectonic plates' move towards each other. So, they have broader walks. East coast has hotels, buildings, casinos as compared to west coast which only have single homes.
Answer:
which case??plessy vs. burgison?(or however you spell it)
