Answer:
yes
Explanation:
a amendment is a change too something, it can change laws
Joseph Smith I'm pretty sure
Over the years and with the constant evolution of society, it is normal for some of the rights of humanity to be reformulated and even replaced by better rights and more consistent with the well-being of society.
As seen above, the Mosaic Law "an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth", stipulated that an individual had to pay their crimes in the same currency. Thus, if a person killed someone, they should be punished with death. Currently, this concept is completely replaced by basic human rights that are defended by the "Universal Declaration of Human Rights", which states that everyone has the right to life and security, regardless of their crimes.
In Australia, the most populated region by natives was places like the outback and what is nowadays known as Alice springs. The New Zealand had a more or less equally spread population because of it's much smaller sides, but there was a bias towards the North where there were more people than in the South of the island.
I cant quite put it, but lots of people died from each side. I'm going to guess negative and here is my starting sentence.
The Spanish-American war was negative because lots of men, and women died from both sides.
I'm going to let you copy the sentence above for your TOPIC sentence. I hope this helped, but you need to know the rest.