1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ipn [44]
3 years ago
13

A piece of fabric measures 3.9 meters. Express this length in centimeters

Mathematics
2 answers:
Andre45 [30]3 years ago
6 0
Your answer would be 390 centimeters because to get centimeters out of meters you multiply it by 100
Kryger [21]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

390 centimeters

Step-by-step explanation:

The length of a piece of fabric = 3.9 meters

We have to convert 3.9 meters in centimeters.

1 meter = 100 centimeters

Now we will multiply the length of 3.9 meters to 100 centimeters.

3.9 meters = 3.9 × 100

                  = 390 centimeters

This length in centimeters = 390 centimeters.

You might be interested in
Find the curl of ~V<br> ~V<br> = sin(x) cos(y) tan(z) i + x^2y^2z^2 j + x^4y^4z^4 k
ch4aika [34]

Given

\vec v =  f(x,y,z)\,\vec\imath+g(x,y,z)\,\vec\jmath+h(x,y,z)\,\vec k \\\\ \vec v = \sin(x)\cos(y)\tan(z)\,\vec\imath + x^2y^2z^2\,\vec\jmath+x^4y^4z^4\,\vec k

the curl of \vec v is

\displaystyle \nabla\times\vec v = \left(\frac{\partial h}{\partial y}-\frac{\partial g}{\partial z}\right)\,\vec\imath - \left(\frac{\partial h}{\partial x}-\frac{\partial f}{\partial z}\right)\,\vec\jmath + \left(\frac{\partial g}{\partial x}-\frac{\partial f}{\partial y}\right)\,\vec k

\nabla\times\vec v = \left(4x^4y^3z^4-2x^2y^2z\right)\,\vec\imath \\\\ - \left(4x^3y^4z^4-\sin(x)\cos(y)\sec^2(z)\right)\,\vec\jmath \\\\ + \left(2xy^2z^2+\sin(x)\sin(y)\tan(z)\right)\,\vec k

\nabla\times\vec v = \left(4x^4y^3z^4-2x^2y^2z\right)\,\vec\imath \\\\ + \left(\sin(x)\cos(y)\sec^2(z)-4x^3y^4z^4\right)\,\vec\jmath \\\\ + \left(2xy^2z^2+\sin(x)\sin(y)\tan(z)\right)\,\vec k

7 0
3 years ago
Which of the following best describes a line
finlep [7]

I would answer, but you didn't give any options.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which equation is a linear equation?<br> y=2x2+3<br> y=2/x+3<br> y=2x+3<br> y=2x+3
Setler [38]
Y=2x+3 is a linear equation.
8 0
3 years ago
Anna and Veronica are on the opposite sides of a tower of 160 meters height. They measure the angle of elevation of the top of t
MAXImum [283]

Answer: The distance between the girls is 362.8 meters.

Step-by-step explanation:

So we have two triangle rectangles that have a cathetus in common, with a length of 160 meters.

The adjacent angle to this cathetus is 40° for Anna, then the opposite cathetus (the distance between Anna and the tower) can be obtained with the relationship:

Tan(A) = opposite cath/adjacent cath.

Tan(40°) = X/160m

Tan(40°)*160m = 134.3 m

Now, we can do the same thing for Veronica, but in this case the angle adjacent to the tower is 55°

So we have:

Tan(55°) = X/160m

Tan(55°)*160m = X = 228.5 m

And we know that the girls are in opposite sides of the tower, so the distance between the girls is equal to the sum of the distance between each girl and the tower, then the distance between the girls is:

Dist = 228.5m + 134.3m = 362.8m

8 0
3 years ago
Explain how the difference of a fraction or a rational number and its additive inverse is equal to zero.
Jobisdone [24]
This question is in reverse (in two ways): 

<span>1. The definition of an additive inverse of a number is precisely that which, when added to the number, will give a sum of zero. </span>

<span>The real problem, in certain fields, is usually to show that for all numbers in that field, there exists an additive inverse. </span>

<span>Therefore, if you tell me that you have a number, and its additive inverse, and you plan to add them together, then I can tell you in advance that the sum MUST be zero. </span>

<span>2. In your question, you use the word "difference", which does not work (unless the number is zero - 0 is an integer AND a rational number, and its additive inverse is -0 which is the same as 0 - the difference would be 0 - -0 = 0). </span>

<span>For example, given the number 3, and its additive inverse -3, if you add them, you get zero: </span>
<span>3 + (-3) = 0 </span>

<span>However, their "difference" will be 6 (or -6, depending which way you do the difference): </span>

<span>3 - (-3) = 6 </span>
<span>-3 - 3 = -6 </span>

<span>(because -3 is a number in the integers, then it has an additive inverse, also in the integers, of +3). </span>

<span>--- </span>

<span>A rational number is simply a number that can be expressed as the "ratio" of two integers. For example, the number 4/7 is the ratio of "four to seven". </span>

<span>It can be written as an endless decimal expansion </span>
<span>0.571428571428571428....(forever), but that does not change its nature, because it CAN be written as a ratio, it is "rational". </span>

<span>Integers are rational numbers as well (because you can always write 3/1, the ratio of 3 to 1, to express the integer we call "3") </span>

<span>The additive inverse of a rational number, written as a ratio, is found by simply flipping the sign of the numerator (top) </span>

<span>The additive inverse of 4/7 is -4/7 </span>

<span>and if you ADD those two numbers together, you get zero (as per the definition of "additive inverse") </span>

<span>(4/7) + (-4/7) = 0/7 = 0 </span>

<span>If you need to "prove" it, you begin by the existence of additive inverses in the integers. </span>
<span>ALL integers each have an additive inverse. </span>
<span>For example, the additive inverse of 4 is -4 </span>

<span>Next, show that this (in the integers) can be applied to the rationals in this manner: </span>

<span>(4/7) + (-4/7) = ? </span>
<span>common denominator, therefore you can factor out the denominator: </span>

<span>(4 + -4)/7 = ? </span>
<span>Inside the bracket is the sum of an integer with its additive inverse, therefore the sum is zero </span>
<span>(0)/7 = 0/7 = 0 </span>

<span>Since this is true for ALL integers, then it must also be true for ALL rational numbers.</span>
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • A frozen dinner at the grocery store is purchased for $2.20 a wholesale and is a marked up for 40 percent. a customer wants to b
    6·1 answer
  • A boat travels 60 miles downstream in the same time it takes to go 36 miles upstream the speed of the boat in Stillwater is 15 m
    11·1 answer
  • Brian made 72 widgets. If kelly and miranda together made three times as many widgets as brian, how many more widgets did they m
    11·1 answer
  • When is interest best compounded?
    14·1 answer
  • Mrs. Summer's third grade class is putting on a play. If she has 13 1/8 yards of fabric, and each student needs 7/8 of a yard fo
    14·2 answers
  • Does this table represent an exponential function x 1 2 3 4 y -1 -8 -27 -64
    5·1 answer
  • In 1943, the temperature in Rapid City, South Dakota, fell about 45 degrees in 5 minutes. What was the average drop in temperatu
    6·1 answer
  • Can someone help me with this
    7·2 answers
  • -6 &lt; -3; Divide both sides by -3 <br><br> here is another question prove how smart you are
    14·1 answer
  • R560 invested at 8% p.a. simple interest for 3 years​
    9·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!