- It created a demand for new raw materials which were often scarce in industrialized countries, thus leading many European nations to build colonies and expand their empires in other continents.
- Mass producing of products, enabling its populace greater mobility in commerce, trade, war, education, etc.
- It assured Western economic and military ascendancy
Conservatives
were actively opposing to the progressive agenda.
<u>Explanation:</u>
Progressive agenda was formed to uplift the people of all class not just focusing on a particular class of people. It was formed to raise the standard of the working class so that they had some savings for their future. The conservatives criticized the progressiveness.
Conservatives found that it was degrading the society because of its modern culture eventually killing traditionalism. Humanism was placed as the center topic where they felt rights and modernism will eventually kill literature and it would give wings to everyone so that each one follow their own rule not falling into the constituency.
After the United States entered in Iraq in 2003, the Iraq did not become a peaceful democracy. Thus, option C is correct.
<h3>Why United States invaded in Iraq in 2003?</h3>
The United States invaded Iraq in 2003 to destroy the equipments which can utilized in the demolition by Saddam Hussain. The United States has killed the Saddam hussain and found gulity in supporting terrorism.
After the United states acquire Iraq , there was violence increased due to majority of community. After few time iraqis elected a new parliament system and adopted a new constitution for the regulations of the country.
Therefore, option C peaceful democracy is adopted is the correct answer.
Learn more about invasion of Iraq, here:
brainly.com/question/13216795
#SPJ1
Physically, as well as psychologically, the Berlin Wall was significant because Berlin was the only city physically separated by the Cold War between the Soviet Union and its Eastern Bloc and Western allies. ... It was possible to limit the entire Cold War to this one nexus point. So I think it was necessary
Edict of Nantes
It was issued in 1598, by king Henry IV Bourbon of France. It was the second document (after The January Edict of 1561) issued by a French sovereign to provide religious freedom in the country. It was a consequence of the long-lasting religious conflicts in France between Catholics and Huguenots (other name for Calvinists), situated mainly in Southern France. King Henry IV succeeded Henry III Valois and his infamous mother Catherine de Medici. Henry IV was one of the most prominent leaders of the Protestant opposition in France, but had to convert to Catholicism (for the second time in his life) in order to inherit the throne. The Edict of Nantes was one of the first things that he did as a king, and, basically, it allowed for the Protestants across the land to hold on to the cities that they had turned into their strongholds, while Catholics did the same, too. This was a compromise and angered many, Catholics because they could not get rid of the "heresy" among their lands, and Protestants because they could not succeed in reforming France once and for all.
