A major difference between socialism and capitalism resides in how likely meritocracy is to flourish .
Socialism, in its rightest essence, would ensure that every individual within society enjoyed the same opportunities at the core (quality health, food, education). Naturally, some of these subjects would thrive more than others and therefore be promoted by society to hold higher levels of responsability and reward.
However, the lesser gifted would never be at a disadvantage. They could still count on standard quality support by the same society and equal opportunity for their offspring to pursue their own ambitions.
On the contrary, capitalism creates a societal gap by supporting inherited advantage. In summary, a capitalist society provides better core opportunities for a group of citizens and their offspring regardless of their innate ambitions. The disadvataged group and their offspring then receive a less than standard core support which predisposes them for hardship in the pursue of societal reward.
The river Nile left behind rich soil when it flooded. So the correct option for the given question is option "B". The river Nile brought with it very rich soil from other places and deposited them in the flood plains. when the flood water receded, the farmers were able to cultivate the land and get a rich vein of crops for feeding all the people making up the civilization near the river banks of Nile. Every year, with new flooding of the plains, new rich soil is brought abd deposited. The farmers are able to reap great crops in the flood plains of the river Nile every year due to this reason.
Winston Churchill called it this to refer the the imaginary wall <span />
Gougpuvuphpu yes you do the right to be the one that is going
