Answer:
The Marshall plan helped prevent the turn to communism of Western Europe, which was a possiblity, especially in Italy and France, where communist parties where very strong.
The logic of the Marshall plan was to help rebuild and develop Western Europe, to show them the benefits of capitalism and a market economy, and prevent like that, the spread of communism from Eastern Europe.
This goal was achieved because no Western European country turned to communism since the end fo the World War, even when socialist and communist parties got to power.
The goal of the Berlin airlift was to prevent a shortage of goods in West Berlin after the Soviet Union blocked supplies to the city.
The Soviet Union wanted to force the US to abandon the city by blocking Berlin, since the Soviet Union dominated all areas sorrounding Berlin. However, the US was able to keep control of West Berlin by supplying the city through air.
Maintaining control of West Berlin was very important for the US for both strategic and symbolic reasons, and the success of the Berlin airlift was a crucial part of the strategy.
For wedding ceremonies, the application and venue expenses are not refundable. In addition to the $25 application cost and the $1 credit card processing fee, there is a $400 site fee. The entire $426.00 non-refundable fee is charged when your application is submitted.
You can wed on the grounds of central park at no cost (unless you are doing it at the conservatory Gardens or at any of the other vendors). Numerous locations included into the park are ideal for your wedding celebration.
Weddings held during the week are often less expensive, with Monday being the least expensive and costs rising as the weekend approaches. Naturally, the difference will differ amongst venues, as high-end venues are always high-end.
Read more about Brooklyn Bridge at
brainly.com/question/29547340
#SPJ4
The G. I. Bill
The Serviceman's Readjustment Act was signed in 1944 and provided returning serviceman money for college, unemployment insurance and housing.
They used questionable methods for reaching their wealth level.
Robber baron was applied to powerful nineteenth-century industrialists who were viewed as having used questionable practices to amass their wealth. On the other hand, “captains of industry” were business leaders whose means of amassing a personal fortune contributed positively to the country in some way.
