The Supreme Court's decision in "Miranda v. Arizona" was based mainly on “the incorporation of due process rights in the Bill of Rights so as to make them apply to the states.”
The Miranda v. Arizona case in 1966 was a landmark case in the US justice since it considered that a prisoner has the right against self-incrimination when questioned by the police and the right of an attorney. This case is known as the “Miranda rights” since the US Supreme Court overturned Miranda’s conviction as his rights were not respected. The confession signed by Miranda when being interrogated by police was not admissible in court.
In this case, option B) is the correct one since the Miranda case is not associated with slavery, “amicus Curiae” or ex post facto laws.
Answer:
<u>They were been guided by God. </u>When I say "they", I am talking about specifically to the first ones - Moses and Joshua.
Explanation:
According to the Bible, God was instructing <u>Moses</u> and telling him where to go and what to do. He has been chosen by God to be the leader, and free them to Egypt. The same thing happens to <u>Joshua</u>, the one who assumes the leadership after Moses's death. <u>Both were guided by God to find the Promised Land.</u>
I don't believe they could have. In order to accomplish what they did, they needed full control of the situation, without fun control, they would not have made things better for their kingdom.
D because they were now aware of challenges that may arise like disease when invading
