Answer:
First i need you to tell me the pattern and then i will help you :)
Step-by-step explanation:
-4/1
-1/0
2/1
5/2
8/3
or put then as ratios the same way i am not so sure
Answer:
D) The manager should fail to reject the null hypothesis; there is not enough evidence to conclude that the number of unique daily listeners has changed.
Step-by-step explanation:
The scenario indicates the null hypotheses and alternative hypotheses are
Null hypotheses: The number of unique daily listeners hasn't changed.
Alternative hypotheses: The number of unique daily listeners has changed.
The null hypothesis is rejected if the calculated p-value is less significance level.
We are given that p-value is 0.0743 and confidence level=0.95.
Significance level =α=1-0.95=0.05.
As we can see the p-value is greater than significance level, so, we fail to reject the null hypotheses at 5% significance level.
Thus, we conclude at the 95% confidence level that the manager should fail to reject the null hypothesis; there is not enough evidence to conclude that the number of unique daily listeners has changed
24v9w9 + 28v5w7y8
Also sub to Stariceie E
This is a quotient (division) of two functions we must be concerned with the fact that division by zero is undefined.
Since g(x) is in the divisor position, it cannot equal 0.
Subtract 6 from both sides to solve.
So the domain is all real numbers except -6
Set notation {x | x ∈ R, x ≠ -6}
Interval notation (-∞,-6)∪(-6,∞)
