Answer: I and III
Step-by-step explanation:
We observe in the case provided that the researcher, who has no interest in the population to intervene, is going to carry out surveys to assess whether the neighborhood is a good place to live, obtaining the following conclusions:
i. The Minneapolis Resident Survey was an observational study.
ii. The Minneapolis Resident Survey was an experiment.
iii. The figure 50.1% is a descriptive statistic for the sample.
iv. The figure 50.1% is a statistical inference for the population.:By estimating the sample, obtained by a lower percentage of the total of the respondents, it is known that with a 95% confidence interval that the rating obtained from the respondents considering that the neighborhood is a good place to live was found between 0.44 and 0.50, taking this interval as a statistical inference for the population.
The correct answer is I and III, since in this study no interventions were made to the population and only one observation of a characteristic of the neighborhood was made and in III we know that the descriptive statistic only describes data and summarizes it, which is a of the ways to display the data from the descriptive survey.
Answer:
B. (1,2)
Step-by-step explanation:
Look at the image down below!! (ﾉ◕ヮ◕)ﾉ*:･ﾟ✧
Answer:
False
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
Shania has read the most pages.
Step-by-step explanation:
Following the formula y = mx + b.
Kevin already read 45 pages.
y = mx + 45
He reads 20 pages per hour, since it has per hour, we put it has "m"
y = 20x + 45
Shania already read 5 pages
y = mx + 5
Shania reads 25 pages per hour
y = 25x + 5
We need to find out how many pages they read after 20 hours, plug 20 into x.
Kevin
20(20) + 45 =
400 + 45 =
445
Shania
25(20) + 5 =
500 + 5 =
505
Shania read 60 more pages than Kevin.
Answer:
can i see a picture?
Step-by-step explanation:
