Answer: C. Rafael will exaggerate the similarities amongst out group members
Explanation: Social identity theory means that each person strives to identify with the group on different grounds, national, family, team, etc., in order to identify with other members of his or her relative group and thus gain self-esteem, believe and feel that belonging to the group increases his / her own worth. The social identity thus acquired is an important mechanism that drives pride and self-esteem. Also belonging to a group provides some security when it comes to other groups, i.e relationships with other groups. The competitive spirit with other groups is important precisely for achieving self-esteem, even when there is no reason for it, i.e when there is no conflict about anything, there is no overlap of interest over specific resources. In order to gain social identity, each member of the group identifies with the other members even more than is realistic, because in this way they gain self-esteem, worth, security, and thus will see members of other groups, much more similar to each other than they actually are.
The type of attributional style that the individual is using
in the scenario above is the internal. Internal in the attributional style are
likely to be based on personal factors that make an event or behavior to occur
or to explain as to why such thing happen. It is based on personal factors such
as feelings or traits of an individual acquires.
<span>In Texas the practice of a member of one party voting in another party's primary election in order to influence who the other party nominates is called party raiding. Party raining is a common tactic that is used within American politics. Those who engage in party raiding do so to try and have a weaker candidate nominated or keep the support of the potential candidates extremely divided. </span>
Answer:
The Ten-Percent Plan Lincoln’s blueprint for Reconstruction included the Ten-Percent Plan, which specified that a southern state could be readmitted into the Union once 10 percent of its voters (from the voter rolls for the election of 1860) swore an oath of allegiance to the Union.
Kind of but not really.
In Miranda, the Supreme Court set forth a new requirement wherein the police were required to tell suspects of their rights under the 5th Amendment.
So, while the Miranda Warning is not listed in the Constitution, the Miranda Warning does reference 5th Amendment rights.
