In order to answer this question, I will use two different perspectives of ethics: the consequentialist perspective, and the deontological perspective.
Consequentialism argues that the morality of an action lies with its consequences. This means that an action with bad consequences is an immoral action, and vice versa. In this case, killing the last remaining Redwood would not have any negative consequence on any being in the world, as no one benefits from it anymore. This means that the act is not immoral.
A deontological perspective states that there are principles that should be taken as rules, and which govern what is right and what is wrong. Therefore, rules and duties are central. For example, a principle might state that "all life is valuable." As the Redwood falls under the definition of life, killing it would be considered an immoral action.
Answer:
the guards became more aggressive.
Explanation:
Psychologist Philip Zimbardo and his colleagues conducted an experiment to figure out if the violence documented by guards in American prisons was due to their sadistic nature or had something to do with the prison environment. Although prisoners and guards were permitted to communicate in any way they chose, the encounters were violent and therefore some volunteers have to be released soon. The guards started to act in ways that were violent and hostile towards the prisoners, whilst the prisoners became passive and discouraged.
I think the correct answer from the choices listed above is option D. The federal court system is responsible for the enforcement of federal codes in administrative trials, civil trials and criminal trials. Hope this answers the question. Have a nice day.
Answer:
- A number of new colonists came to Louisiana to live.
- New Orleans was rebuilt in the wake of the Good Friday fire.
- Esteban Rodríguez Miró was appointed governor of Louisiana.
