The case <em>Miranda v. Arizona (1966)</em> was a landmark decision of the Supreme Court in which the court established that prosecutors cannot use a person's statements made in response to interrogation in police custody as evidence at their trial, unless the person was informed of what is known as "Miranda warning," but voluntarily waived these rights.
A "Miranda warning" is an explanation given to people arrested that informs them of the right to consult with an attorney before and during questioning. It also informs them of the right against self-incrimination before police questioning. The court's ruling protect those accused of a crime because it prevents them from incriminating themselves. It also reminds them of the importance of an attorney for achieving a successful trial.
Answer:
its neither she won 3 of them
Explanation:
The answer is true, but don’t you love the way they say “only” while still talking about billions that’s “only” more money than I’ll see
Democracy is the belief that freedom shall be for all, and all people should hold a voice in government. It is a type of government.
Mexican Americans, Filipino Americans, and Anglo Americans contribute to the economy of California society.
<h3>Which people contribute to the economy of California society?</h3>
The California economy society was based on Mexican Americans, Filipino Americans, and Anglo Americans because people of Mexican, Filipino, and Anglo migrated to California and contribute to its economy.
So we can conclude that Mexican Americans, Filipino Americans, and Anglo Americans contribute to the economy of California society.
Learn more about economy here: brainly.com/question/1106682
#SPJ1
