Answer:B. Opponents of active stabilization policy believe that significant time lag in both fiscal and monetary policy often excercebate economic fluctuations.
C. Advocate of active stabilization policy believe that the government can adjust monetary and fiscal policy to counter waves of excessive optimism and pessimism among consumers and business.
Examples of automatic stabilizer
A. Corporate income taxes
B. Personal income taxes
Explanation:
Stabilization policy helps to stabilize the economy during expansionary or deficit period however a lag in the implementation will surely affect getting the right outputs from the implementation.
The economy has inbuilt stabilizer s that tend to correct excessiveness in economy such as the personal and corporate tax . The federal fund rate will be adjusted as the need be to stabilizer the economy even though it can be used as a stabilizer but it's not an automatic stabilizer.
Answer:
The Cash paid to suppliers was $85,000
Explanation:
Data provided in the question:
Cost of goods sold = $100,000
Decrease in inventory = $5,000
Increase in accounts payable = $10,000
Now,
Cash paid to suppliers will be
= Cost of goods sold - Decrease in inventory - Increase in accounts payable
= $100,000 - $5,000 - $10,000
= $85,000
Hence,
The Cash paid to suppliers was $85,000
Answer:
Amount of Check = $784
so correct option is a. $784
Explanation:
given data
Merchandise on account = $1,000
Long Company returns = $200
credit terms = 2/10
n/30
to find out
What is the amount of the check
solution
we know here that Total Merchandise will be
Total Merchandise = Merchandise on account - returns ....................1
Total Merchandise = $1000 - $200
Total Merchandise = $800
and
discount will be here
Discount = 0.02 × 800
returns = $16
so
Amount of Check will be as
Amount of Check = Total Merchandise - Discount ...................2
put here value
Amount of Check = Total Merchandise - Discount
Amount of Check = $800 - $16
Amount of Check = $784
so correct option is a. $784
Based on the percentage of readers who own a particular make of the car and the random sample, we can infer that there is sufficient evidence at a 0.02 level to support the executive claim.
<h3>What is the evidence to support the executive's claim?</h3>
The hypothesis is:
Null hypothesis : P = 0.55
Alternate hypothesis : P ≠ 0.55
We then need to find the test statistic:
= (Probability found by marketing executive - Probability from publisher) / √( (Probability from publisher x (1 - Probability from publisher))/ number of people sampled
= (0.46 - 0.55) / √(( 0.55 x ( 1 - 0.55)) / 200
= -2.56
Using this z value as the test statistic, perform a two-tailed test to show:
= P( Z < -2.56) + P(Z > 2.56)
= 0.0052 + 0.0052
= 0.0104
The p-value is 0.0104 which is less than the significance level of 0.02. This means that we reject the null hypothesis.
The Marketing executive was correct.
Find out more on the null and alternate hypothesis at brainly.com/question/25263462
#SPJ1
Answer:
Net profit is more important to consider because it accounts for all the costs associated with making and selling the product and it includes the operating expenses that are excluded from gross profit. Gross profit is the profit made after deducting costs associated with making and selling its products, or the costs associated with providing its services.
