Answer:
The answer is option "C"
Explanation:
popular sovereignty is the rule that the authority of a state and its administration are made and supported by the consent of its people, through their chosen agents (rule by the individuals), who are the wellspring of all political force. popular sovereignty communicates an idea, and doesn't really reflect or depict a political reality.
To discuss popular sovereignty is to put extreme expert in the individuals. There are an assortment of manners by which power might be communicated. It could be quick as in individuals make the law themselves, or intervened through delegates who are dependent upon political decision and review; it very well might be extreme as in individuals have a negative or blackball over enactment, or it very well might be something significantly less sensational. So, mainstream sway covers a large number of institutional prospects. For each situation, in any case, popular sovereignty accepts the presence of some type of famous assent, and it is thus that each meaning of conservative government infers a theory of consent.
Answer:
The Categorical Imperative, was the philosophical view of moral actions and behavior in people, according to Immanuel Kant, its creator. Basically, this philosophy states that there are universal truths that cannot be altered, or changed, by absolutely anything: not by culture, not by genetics, not by learning, and much less by the beliefs of the majority. A truth is what it is, and it must be obeyed as the utmost "right", not merely what is "good".
In contrast to Kant´s philosophy, which was born from Kant´s displeasure with how the society of his time behaved, it was hypothetical imperatives that would dictate how people needed to behave to be considered moral. These hypothetical imperatives were truths that were dependent on certain circumstances, and on empirical knowledge, and therefore, were bound to change given certain conditions. This was something that Kant could not tolerate and thus fed his need to create his Categorical Imperative philosophy.
However, even during his own time Kant´s philosophy was criticized and questioned. And one person who did that was Benjamin Constant, who proposed the idea of the Inquiring Murdered. He said that if Kant´s philosophy of moral behavior was absolute, then when a murdered asked a question, he should be given the TRUTH, because that woud be what was universally held as morally right. But if that truth led to the murderer finding his victim, then, what did the philosophy told people was right to do? This questioning showed even Kant that there were instances in which due to the nature of the situation, lying would not be held as wrong, but rather, as the correct measure to act morally.
Answer:
c. mutation and natural selection
Explanation:
The major forces causing the genetic divergence of the two populations are <u>mutation and natural selection</u>. Natural selection results when organisms adapt to a prevailing environmental condition, those who are unable to adapt, die out. The adaptation for survival is passed on to the next generation. mutation on the other hand is a change in gene structure which results in a new variation in the population. This variation can be passed to the next generation.
<span>d. view intelligence as mainly cognitive and intellectual.</span>
Answer:
Storm of Steel (in German: In Stahlgewittern) is the memoir of German officer Ernst Jünger's experiences on the Western Front during the First World War. It was originally printed privately in 1920, making it one of the first personal accounts to be published. The book is a graphic account of trench warfare. It was largely devoid of editorialization when first published, but was heavily revised several times.
Explanation:
