A
C
A
C
B
C
Those are the answers to those in respective order
(Favorable slogan) Virtue, mission, and destiny under God.
This slogan summarizes the three main points used by the advocates of the “Manifest Destiny” doctrine (virtue of the American people, a mission to change the “Old World” and the manifest destiny under God’s guidance). Considering the thesis of the “American exceptionality”, the country had the legitimacy to expand itself while spreading the values of freedom and democracy.
(Unfavorable slogan) Don’t plant in America’s soil the seed of imperialism! Say no to the right of conquest!
Many were critic with the “Manifest Destiny” doctrine and considered it to be belligerent and contrary to the Republican values. It constituted a call for aggression which was, according to their point of view, a contradiction with the democratic founding values of the country.
Answer: your question is not properly arranged. Please let me assume your question to be arranged this way:
People who use artificial sweeteners in place of sugar tend to be heavier than people who use sugar, thus we can conclude that artificial sweeteners are detrimental to weight loss efforts. This is an example of: Group of answer choices
a. Extrapolation
b. Misuse of cause and effect
c. influential outlier
THE ANSWER: a. Extrapolation
Explanation: Extrapolation is the conclusion of a general events using a specific event. It means estimating or concluding something by assuming a current method will continue to exist or will remain applicable to every other method, without any scientific proof or experiment in the lab or workshop.
In this content, this person has extrapolated artificial sweetener to be a cause of weight gain. Which may not be applied to everyone using artificial sweeteners. His research was concluded based on the people he meet, without considering the fact that, he has not meet everyone yet.
This is not misuse of cause and effect, because they is no proof yet, that artificial sweeteners is the cause of their weight gain.
This is not Influential outlier, because may have not deviated totally from some other observations of people using artificial sweeteners to people using sugar.
Olives are such an important crop in because they are used to eat and make olive oil for cooking food, putting it on bread to eat, cleaning and moisturizing skin, and to use in clay lamps, which provide the main form of light in their homes.
None of these conclusions is valid.
- The first one implies that people either think that their employer should cover part of the health insurance costs (as said in the original sentence), or they think that the employer should pay 100%. This is not correct because there are other possible opinions people can have, like thinking that the employer shouldn't pay for anything, for example.
- The second conclusion is invalid for the same reason: it implies that people can only either think that the employer should pay a large part, or that the employer shouldn't pay anything. It is not considering other options.
- The third conclusion does not work either because it is referring to what people think about <em>the amount </em>of the costs themselves, whereas the original topic was <em>how</em> they are paid for.
