Answer:
The bond that should pay the highest interest rate is:
d. a bond issued by a new restaurant chain.
Explanation:
This is based on the fact that the new restaurant chain is untested, has higher risk profile and the bondholders are assuming higher risks, and the bond cannot be compared to the bonds issued by the US government, New York State, and General Motors, in that order. The new restaurant chain will be offering a higher rate of return than others because it is new to the bond market and would like to attract potential bond investors. Without the higher rate, therefore, it will not be successful in the bond issuance.
If a company spent that much on internet advertising and increased it by 17%, the new amount spent would be $12.87 million.
<h3>How much did the company spend on advertising?</h3>
The amount spent can be calculated as:
= Amount x ( 1 + increase in advertising)
Solving gives:
= 11 million x ( 1 + 17%)
= 11 x 1.17
= $12.87 million
Find out more on advertising expenses at brainly.com/question/24967768.
Answer:
11.63 million dollar
Explanation:
In 2005 the construction cost index was 1746 , in 2015 , it was 3260.
change in index in 10 years = 3260-1746 = 1514
change in 5 years ( estimated ) = 757
Estimated index in 2010 = 1746 + 757
= 2503
Estimated index in 2020 = 3260 + 757
= 4017
Value of building in 2010 = 1746 million dollar
Value of similar building - X
X / 1746 = index in 2020 (probable ) / index in 2010
X / 7.25 = 4017 / 2503
X = 11.63 million dollar
45 000 долл, это равенство владельцев.
Answer:
First we need to first find the equilibrium quantity and price during normal times.
The equilibrium price in normal times is P=$3 and the equilibrium quantity is 55 bottles.
During the hurricane, the government will set a price ceiling of $3. We can infer from the table that the quantity supplied at P=$3 is 55 bottles while the quantity demanded during hurricane at the price of $3 per bottle is 105 bottles. Hence,
105-55= 50
During a hurricane, there would be a shortage of 50 bottles of water.
If there were no price ceiling, then the equilibrium price would be such that the quantity demanded during hurricane equals the quantity supplied. From the table we can see that the equilibrium price would in that case be P=$5 per bottle where the equilibrium quantity is 85 bottles. With the price ceiling only 55 bottles are available for trading. Now without the price ceiling 85 bottles are available.
Hence consumers would have to pay an additional $2 (=5-3) but they can now buy an additional 30 bottles [=85-55].
Without the antiprice gouging law, consumers would have to pay $2 more than the ceiling price, but they would bv able to buy 30 more bottles of water.
