<u>Answer:
</u>
The student version that is based on the original source material is not plagiarism.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
- Though the idea that is enumerated in both the versions speaks about the same concept, there are no visible signs of replacement paraphrasing having been used in the student version.
- The way the idea has been elaborated in the student version clarifies that the student has processed the concept through a different perspective and has put in his own words what he has understood about the concept including some extra information.
The governor of the State would call for an election to replace the senator or representative if a senator or a representative from Florida resigned or left office for some reason. This is according to the quote, "When vacancies happen in the Representation from any State, the Executive Authority thereof shall issue Writs of Election to fill such Vacancies".
The answer would be letter A.
Answer:
your answer would be a congress could not sign treaties. It's in your explanation says Congress had no power to Levy taxes or regulate trade without federal court system executive leaders that one was not a strength of the Articles of the Confederation
Explanation:
There were more weaknesses than strengths under the Articles of Confederation. The lack of power given to the Continental Congress strangled the federal government. The Articles gave Congress the power to pass laws but no power to enforce those laws. If a state did not support a federal law, that state could simply ignore it. Congress had no power to levy taxes or regulate trade. Without a federal court system or executive leader, there would be no way to enforce these laws, either. Amending the Articles of Confederation would also require a unanimous decision, which would be extremely difficult.
Companies should not be able to own DNA in plants.
Explanation:
It is against the spirit of the world at large and very ill advised to allow companies to own seeds and their DNA which would make them monopolize the produce of certain plants over another.
This can lead to catastrophic changes in the ecosystem as well as the risk that some plants required by people to be free will become costly and lobbied for.
This is a capitalistic endeavor that would lead to too much power in the hands of the corporations.
The free soil party i think :)
The Free Soil Party was a short-lived coalition political party in the United States active from 1848 to 1854, when it merged into the Republican Party. The party was largely focused on the single issue of opposing the expansion of slavery into the western territories of the United States.
