Answer:
No, contracts for personal services are not assignable.
Explanation:
According to a different source, these are the options that come with this question:
Yes, as long as the assignment does not increases the burden on Max.
Yes, Claire can assign her obligations under the contract to anyone who accepts.
No, contracts for personal services are not assignable.
No, the assignment is not valid since Max did not give any consideration.
This is most likely not a good strategy for this woman. The fact that this woman has been hired as a freelance web designer means thta the woman is beig paid for her professional expertise. No one else can perform the job in the way that she can perform it. Therefore, she cannot assign this duty to another person.
Answer:
$2,608.65
Explanation:
The computation of the loan amount is shown below:
But before that first we have to determine the interest which is
= Principal × rate of interest × number of days ÷ total number of days in a year
= $2,500 × 11.75% × 135 days ÷ 365 days
= $108.65
The rate of interest given is 11 
And, the 135 days is from Sept 14 to Jan 27
So, the total amount paid is
= $108.65 + $2,500
= $2,608.65
The fraud at healthsouth at the structural level of the company was more intense because checks and balances were eliminated and organizational culture was compromised
The HealthSouth fraud took place in an intriguing time of economic expansion and lax laws, which made accounting fraud considerably simpler. Investors and lenders were more concerned with revenue in the 1990s than they were with profitability. Growth was important when a company was asking for funding. CEOs were under pressure, including Scrushy, to maintain company growth and consistently above analyst predictions. Along with this increased demand for growth, there emerged an odd legal climate.
The HealthSouth CFOs (described as: filling "holes" in the balance sheet with "dirt") changed their earnings figures. The fraud went unnoticed until 2003, when Weston Smith, a former HealthSouth CFO, told federal authorities about it. It involved inappropriately capitalizing spending, overestimating insurance reimbursements, overvaluing fixed assets, and employing flawed reserve accounting.
To learn more about fraud click here:
brainly.com/question/14971645
#SPJ4
Answer:
The answer is B
Explanation:
GDP is no affected by Scott's production of the jewelry box.
Answer: Objective and Specific
Explanation:
According to the given scenario, the Starbucks is basically analyzing the market segments by using the proper marketing search process and it using the objective and the specific base of the segmentation for evaluating the each segments in the given data.
The main component of the segmentation is the objective that helps in reducing the overall risk in the decision process and also increase the overall efficiency of the product in the market.
Therefore, Objective and Specific is the correct answer.
