The conclusion drawn is inappropriate because the data collection is unreliable and the method used for collection is wrong.
Explanation:
The use of wrong methods for the collection of data for such studies and then drawing conclusions out of them is one of the causes for the study to be said to be unreliable completely.
There is no way to reliably conclude the age at which the children start to walk by talking to the parents as parents do not qualify or take time data of the time children start walking.
The parents are unreliable sources here no matter how big the sample size is and only the researchers themselves could notice and get the reliable results required in this case.
Answer:
<em>Defense of life standard</em>
Explanation:
Right to self-defense allows an individual to use a counterforce to repel an attack that can take their life or injure them severely
The official statement as contained in Article 3 of the 1979 Code of Conduct states that:
<em>"Every effort should be made to exclude the use of firearms, especially against children. In general, firearms should not be used except when a suspected
offender offers armed resistance or otherwise jeopardizes the lives of others and less extreme measures are not sufficient to restrain or apprehend the suspected offender".</em>
The police also have the right to self-defense and this is employed in the defense of life standard.
The correct answer is A :)
Answer:
they are yoused to pay for school and military
Explanation: the state use the taxes we pay for those things
