1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Andrei [34K]
4 years ago
6

Which of the following is not an element that must be shown for trespass to realty?a. Defendant entered the land of another with

out permissionb. Defendant caused an object to be placed on the land of another without the owner's permissionc. Defendant removed the owner's personal property from the owner's possession and controld. Defendant stayed on the property after the owner tells him to leavee. Defendant refused to remove something he placed on the property after the owner asks him to remove it
Law
2 answers:
RSB [31]4 years ago
3 0

Answer:

An element that does not show trespass to realty is: d) Defendant refused to remove something he placed on the property after the owner asks him to remove it.

Explanation:

Trespass to realty means that a person traspass a property or an object that does not belong to him or her. Element D) wouldn't count as trespass because it doesn´t said the object was there without the initial permission of the owner.

SashulF [63]4 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Defendant refused to remove something he placed on the property after the owner asks him to remove it.

Explanation:

This is the statement that best describes an element that does not need to be shown for trespass to realty. A claim for trespass to realty is a claim that argues the intentional intrusion upon real property. More importantly, this intrusion must interfere with a possessory interest in the property. A victim of this trespass might be able to recover compensatory damages.

You might be interested in
Identify and explain the eight general forecasts that experts believe are likely to occur in the area of computer crime.
VMariaS [17]

Answer:

Explanation:

1. The GDPR reality will hit

After six years of preparation, hype and debate the EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) will be enforced beginning May 25, 2018.

Many firms processing EU citizens’ data from outside of the EU may not have understood that they, too, will be affected by the regulations. Recent analysis suggests that few firms are ready for the new regulations, raising the likelihood of breaches and potential fines.

2. Malware authors will get smarter

In recent years, a big trend in the anti-malware market has been the use of machine learning algorithms in detection engines that rely on features extracted from known bad samples.

These bad samples include metadata values, exported function names, and suspicious actions.

Malware authors will get better at building techniques to outsmart them as “NextGen AV” solutions become more commonplace.

In recent months we have seen malware filled with legitimate code and functionality which appears to have no purpose but to outsmart machine learning algorithms.

3. Extortion through ransomware hack-and-leak

There has been a rise in ransomware in recent years, partly enabled by online criminal malware marketplaces and partly due to the popularity of Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies.

Businesses are a natural target for such attacks, as seen with WannaCry and Petya last year.

Ransomware can be spread across a large number of networked devices for maximum impact. Businesses rarely pay a ransom of this nature, as they typically have backups they can revert to when needed.

A more dangerous approach we believe criminals will begin to implement is stealing information and extorting victims by threatening to leak if ransom isn't paid. These leaks could be highly damaging, including incurring substantial fines, loss of customers, embarrassment to executives, and more.

4. Market manipulation via hack or Twitter bot

There haven’t been many cases of criminals looking for ways to target and exploit the stock market system online. However, the market remains an attractive target, as playing the market is “out-of-band” from the hack itself.

We predict we’ll see a repurposing of “fake-news” Twitter bots to push market-relevant information, which could be used in “pump-and-dump” style attacks, or could be targeted at algorithmic trading “bots.”

5. The ‘battle of the bots’ will emerge

It’s inevitable that attackers will begin to incorporate machine learning and artificial intelligence (AI) at the same rate as network defense tools. We may already be at this point, with online Twitter bots able to react to emerging events and craft messages to respond.

This could be the year we see the first battle of the AI bots. As cyber-criminals build systems that can “learn” and adapt to defenses, detection engines will also evolve using AI.

6. Supply chain woes

2017 was a huge year for supply chain attacks. We predict this will continue as criminals see this type of attack to be more and more viable.

The biggest chunk of this may be software supply chain compromise rather than third-party or hardware compromise.

7. Sociotechnical approaches to risk

Securing information has become less about having firewalls and policies, and more about complex interactions between people and machines.

Practitioners have also realized there is need to consider systems as a whole, rather than as discrete components, and have now begun to consider new approaches.

A possible new approach is safety engineering, which is already copied across other domains.

We may see greater emphasis on evolving security beyond traditional approaches, incorporating sociotechnical analysis.

8. IDN Homograph Domain Spoofing

The internationalized domain name (IDN) homograph technique uses similar characters in non-Latin alphabets to appear similar to the targeted Latin alphabet domain.

The non-Latin characters are interpreted by the Latin web browsers as “punycode.”

As an example, the punycode of “xn--oogle-qmc” resolves to “google.” Note the two different types of “g.”

Recently we have observed this technique being employed on a larger scale. Although it has been a proof of concept and used sparingly for a number of years, attackers can use a vast amount of subtle letter swaps using this technique.

We predict this technique will increase this year if web browsers continue converting the punycode domain into the unicode domain, thus appearing to be the legitimate domain to the end user.

While it’s difficult to predict what the future holds, it’s important to remain vigilant and aware to proactively defend against cybercrime.

5 0
3 years ago
Someone please help me with this question!!!!
d1i1m1o1n [39]

Answer:

the others are already answered

Explanation:

For general intent, the prosecution need only prove that the defendant intended to do the act in question, whereas proving specific intent would require the prosecution to prove that the defendant intended to bring about a specific consequence through his or her actions, or that he or she perform the action

3 0
3 years ago
Termino para designar a persona que se infecta pero no desarrollan ningun sintoma
Anit [1.1K]
‘Asintomático’ sería su respuesta.
4 0
3 years ago
Rights of minority groups is part of the _____ party platform.
Ostrovityanka [42]

Answer:

Democratic.

Explanation:

In the US, the two main political parties are the Republican and the Democrats. The Republicans are highly connected with a conservative agenda, often focusing on economic agenda in a nationalist bias. The democrats are also patriotic, but they tend to work on human rights struggle, usually working with the right of minority and social programs.

4 0
3 years ago
What type of mens rea might apply in each situation?
Fynjy0 [20]

Answer:

- The mugging of the police officer: purposeful

- The theft/disappearance of the fingerprints: knowing or negligent

- The arson: purposeful or reckless

Explanation:

Mens rea means "a guilty mind" as is required to prove a crime, along with actus reus (the criminal act). A purposeful mens rea means a crime was intentionally commited. A negligent mens rea is the failure to do what a reasonable person would do. A knowing mens rea means the potential result of a criminal act (such as lending a gun to someone who intends to shoot another person). A reckless mens rea increases risk to others, like driving under the influence.

Together, actus reus and mens rea form the corpus delicti or, both the criminal act and guilty mind.

7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • A candidate for president must be
    11·1 answer
  • What is the purpose of the Twenty-fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution?
    13·1 answer
  • What does the second principle talk about (social contract) and how does this relate to the Declaration of Independence? Include
    9·1 answer
  • How many road signs questions are on the DMV California permit test?
    9·1 answer
  • The Framers of the US Constitution created two separate houses of Congress, each of which they expected would serve different co
    14·1 answer
  • The penalties for a first-time DUI charge include imprisonment for __________.
    5·1 answer
  • House was riding his bike on a city street. While he was riding, he frequently looked back to verify that the books that he had
    7·1 answer
  • Once you identified a potential conflict of interest,which question should you ask yourself next?
    13·2 answers
  • Why do you think many lawyers begin as public defenders?
    15·2 answers
  • Please explain in detail how social psychology can play an important role in courts of Pakistan?
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!