Which of the following is not an element that must be shown for trespass to realty?a. Defendant entered the land of another with
out permissionb. Defendant caused an object to be placed on the land of another without the owner's permissionc. Defendant removed the owner's personal property from the owner's possession and controld. Defendant stayed on the property after the owner tells him to leavee. Defendant refused to remove something he placed on the property after the owner asks him to remove it
An element that does not show trespass to realty is: d) Defendant refused to remove something he placed on the property after the owner asks him to remove it.
Explanation:
Trespass to realty means that a person traspass a property or an object that does not belong to him or her. Element D) wouldn't count as trespass because it doesn´t said the object was there without the initial permission of the owner.
Defendant refused to remove something he placed on the property after the owner asks him to remove it.
Explanation:
This is the statement that best describes an element that does not need to be shown for trespass to realty. A claim for trespass to realty is a claim that argues the intentional intrusion upon real property. More importantly, this intrusion must interfere with a possessory interest in the property. A victim of this trespass might be able to recover compensatory damages.
Explanation: since its a city, its at the local level. If it would be state, it would be larger like for the entire state. And national would obviously be entire country rather than just a state or a single city.
