Answer:
Brayden should dispose of the gum
Explanation:
In the given scenario the law in Singapore states that having chewing gum is illegal. As far as Brayden is in Singapore he should comply with the law there.
The equal protection clause is a provision of law that states that all citizens must be treated equally under the law.
Although this gives one the right to take retain actions, in this case Brayden will be restricted from having chewing gum.
Of he is allowed to carry chewing gum then he expects to be treated differently from others in Singapore. This violates the equal protection clause
Executive branch has the power to declare laws unconstitutional
Answer:
Protesting about how to improve your own country is patriotic.
Explanation:
To have the need to want to improve the flaws of a governmental structure could arguably be the most patriotic. You naturally see a problem and want to fix it for the betterment of the nation.
Answer:
No
Explanation:
Because the Housing Authority tacked an eviction notice on Lindsey’s door. That means she has to receive it. If they send it through the mail, it'll make sense that she hasn't received the letter because it could be lost in the other mail, but the Housing Authority put it on the door which means she did see it, but she just ignored it. She knows that she was supposed to come to court on time and on the correct date. It's like if she's turning in homework late in #oogle Classroom while ignoring the due date and time. To be honest, I think that maybe the Housing Authority should of give her at least two or three warnings, but Lindsey did actually see the letter.
Brainlist pls!
A concurring opinion means they agree with the decision but not the rationale behind it
