2) Either regulatory or antitrust. I haven't taken econ (except for Academic Decathlon Econ), so I might be wrong on this one.
3) <span>Blake Mycoskie
</span>4) Joseph Unahue because all the others invented their own products.
5) Demand for avocados would increase, causing prices to decrease. Look at the supply vs demand curve. They're inverse of one another. Basic econ
6) <span>the cost of luxury items like jewelry increases. if it's a luxury item, the supply will never increase; it will remain the same. but if there is less demand for it, then the cost will go up so that shop owners can pay off their bills.
7 and 8 aren't showing up for me so I think you typed too much in the problem.
Hope that helps. </span>
Answer:
No because they could be very gross
Explanation:
I know it is wrong but i tried
Answer:
4. the South
Explanation:
There states with "right to work" laws in all regions of the country, except for the Northeast, but only in the South are all states so called "right to work states", meaning that all of the Southern states have enacted these types of laws.
According to the right to work laws, workers should not be obliged to pay union fees or to belong to an union. Advocates of these laws defend them on the basis of personal freedom, while opponents argue that these laws weaken unionization, and that promote the use of many union services by workers who do not pay fees (a phenomenon known as freeriding) since the government demand laws to represent all workers, regardless of whether they have paid a fee or not.
Answer:
Act utilitarianism
Explanation:
Act utilitarianism is the belief that an action becomes morally right when it produces the greatest good for the greatest number of people.
Act utilitarians believe that whenever we are deciding what to do, we should perform the action that will create the greatest net utility.
Sylvia is least likely to use a life policy, since she has been seriously injured but fortunately she has not died, and her injuries have not caused a terminal or critical illness. Instead, she is more likely to use a property policy or a disability policy, given that, as a result of the tornado, her home and her car have been damaged, and she is injured and cannot work for six months. The property policy will cover the material damages, and the disability policy will provide her with an income while she is unable to work.
