1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
masha68 [24]
3 years ago
11

What were some benefits that Mesopotamians had establishing a civilization in this area

Social Studies
1 answer:
Rama09 [41]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

In ancient times, it was easier to travel by boat than over land. Few roads existed during this time. Also, because of the rivers, this area had arich supply of fish and waterfowl that could be used for food. The land in this area was flat and fertile, rich in nutrients.

Explanation:

hope this helps!

You might be interested in
Who was more powerful- the western Roman emperor or the eastern Roman emperor? Why?
EleoNora [17]
The western because he took over more land and ruled more
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Please Help I will reward brainliest
3241004551 [841]
Declare war and make treaties


3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Archetypes and other commonalities of myths are exactly the same across cultures, regardless of geography and specific aspects o
polet [3.4K]

The correct answer is True

A myth is a symbolic-imagery narrative, that is, the myth is not an independent reality, but it evolves with the historical and ethnic conditions related to a given culture, which seeks to explain and demonstrate, through action and the way of being of the characters, the origin of things.

8 0
3 years ago
Would you have supported or opposed the kansas-nebraska act? why?
erik [133]
The Kansas-Nebraska Act was passed in 1854, and according to this act, slavery was permitted throughout Kansas and Nebraska, and these two states were supposed to be admitted into the Union. However, there were many riots, both from pro-slavery movement, and anti-slavery movement, so the act didn't come into effect.

I would definitely be against the Act because, like I said, it allowed slavery in those two states. Slavery is illegal - you cannot be the owner of any person because we are all people. And given that according to this Act, that is exactly what you could do in those states, I would have definitely opposed it then, and now.
7 0
3 years ago
Which theory do you think better explains how societies operate—structural functionalism or conflict theory? Why?
AVprozaik [17]

Answer: conflict theory

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How do employees benefit from the government being involved in the labor market?
    10·1 answer
  • According to the economic principle of plottage, combining two adjacent lots into a large one will produce a higher total land v
    10·1 answer
  • On what continent is Ancient Greece located?
    9·2 answers
  • Which was not a change taking place in the United States in the late 1800s?
    9·2 answers
  • Claude is giving a speech on japan. while writing his speech, he is careful not to make any comments about their ideas and custo
    5·1 answer
  • How many pangolins are left in the world?
    12·1 answer
  • The process by which the human body gets oxygen and gets rid of carbon dioxide is called
    10·1 answer
  • What was a consequence of the Leo Frank case in the state of Georgia?
    9·1 answer
  • Mrs. McGee's class is making a list of examples of how weathering and erosion changes the surface of Earth. Which of the followi
    12·1 answer
  • Maps provide information through _____ and symbols.
    11·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!