Answer:
the third option
Step-by-step explanation:
x= 13
72,928 is the answer. Don't forget to rate and give me brainliest answer! Then, I can help you with all your problems! ^-^ ~
The question is somehow incomplete but the answer is it in
the inferential stage of probability-based inference. It is in
complex networks of codependent variables is an lively theme in statistical
research, encouraged by such varied presentations as predicting, pedigree examination
and troubleshooting.
Answer:
Yes, because the bike order meets the restrictions of 4c + 6a ≤ 120 and 4c + 4a ≤ 100
Step-by-step explanation:
4c + 6a ≤ 120:
You can set up the inequality 4c + 6a ≤ 120, because it takes 4 hours to build per child bike (c) and 6 hours to build an adult bike (a), all together this time cannot surpass 120 hours. That is why you use the 'less than or equal to' sign.
4c + 4a ≤ 100:
You can then set up the inequality 4c + 4a ≤ 100, because it takes 4 hours to test a child bike (c) and 4 hours to test an adult bike (a). Since 100 hours is the max amount of time they can use to test out bikes, you will use the 'less than or equal to' sign.
4(5) + 6(15) = 20 + 90 = 110. 110 is less than 120
4(5) + 4(15) = 20 + 60 = 80. 80 is less than 100
Yes, because the bike order meets the restrictions of 4c + 6a ≤ 120 and 4c + 4a ≤ 100
