Answer:
Yes
Explanation:
The getaway driver will most likely be forind guilty as they are both involved in the burglary theft just only for his partner to cart away additional stuff (cocaine) what chbwas not part of the initial agreement. However, one thing still remains, which is that the getaway driver and the cocaine thief acted together in other to perform an unlawful burglary. What the getaway driver is being charged for is being an accomplice which he actually his just not on the theft of cocaine. But that the only way he could be cleared of being an accomplice on cocaine theft is for the other thief to confess which will still lead them into another court case.
How to put this app in Portuguese (use on iPad)?
Answer:
it represents in the first one
With his parents, Joel was employing the door-in-the-face compliance technique.
A compliance tactic that is frequently researched in social psychology is the door-in-the-face approach. The persuader makes a sizable request that the respondent will probably reject in an effort to get them to agree, kind of like metaphorically slamming a door in the persuader's face.
In the door-in-the-face method, compliance is improved by making an incredibly difficult request first, followed by a target request that is genuinely wanted.
An illustration of this would be if you refused a friend's request to borrow an excessive amount of money, only for them to later ask for a lower amount and receive your approval. The door-in-the-face tactic is frequently employed to get individuals to make a financial contribution.
To learn more about door-in-the-face technique
brainly.com/question/29380131
#SPJ4
