1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
mr Goodwill [35]
3 years ago
13

Which of the following statements is supported by the map?

History
1 answer:
Andru [333]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

C. Air routes connecting the East Coast to the West Coast were in place before routes that serviced the cities in the southern United States

Explanation:

The air routes were not established between all major cities across the US at the same time. The air routes started to be established in the northeastern part of the country first, and when it came to longer air routes that connected the East Coast major cities with the rest of the country, the cities that were preferred were the ones on the West Coast, not the cities on the south which were much closer. There were several reasons for this, one of which was that the East Coast cities were in better relations with the West Coast cities, and the other that it was of greater economic benefit that the two coasts are connected.

You might be interested in
How did the nullification crisis challenge federal authority over states?
jasenka [17]

Toward the end of his first term in office, Jackson was forced to confront the state of South Carolina on the issue of the protective tariff. Business and farming interests in the state had hoped that Jackson would use his presidential power to modify tariff laws they had long opposed. In their view, all the benefits of protection were going to Northern manufacturers, and while the country as a whole grew richer, South Carolina grew poorer, with its planters bearing the burden of higher prices.

The protective tariff passed by Congress and signed into law by Jackson in 1832 was milder than that of 1828, but it further embittered many in the state. In response, a number of South Carolina citizens endorsed the states' rights principle of "nullification," which was enunciated by John C. Calhoun, Jackson's vice president until 1832, in his South Carolina Exposition and Protest (1828). South Carolina dealt with the tariff by adopting the Ordinance of Nullification, which declared both the tariffs of 1828 and 1832 null and void within state borders. The legislature also passed laws to enforce the ordinance, including authorization for raising a military force and appropriations for arms.

Nullification was only the most recent in a series of state challenges to the authority of the federal government. There had been a continuing contest between the states and the national government over the power of the latter, and over the loyalty of the citizenry, almost since the founding of the republic. The Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions of 1798, for example, had defied the Alien and Sedition Acts, and in the Hartford Convention, New England voiced its opposition to President Madison and the war against the British.

In response to South Carolina's threat, Jackson sent seven small naval vessels and a man-of-war to Charleston in November 1832. On December 10, he issued a resounding proclamation against the nullifiers. South Carolina, the president declared, stood on "the brink of insurrection and treason," and he appealed to the people of the state to reassert their allegiance to that Union for which their ancestors had fought.

When the question of tariff duties again came before Congress, it soon became clear that only one man, Senator Henry Clay, the great advocate of protection (and a political rival of Jackson), could pilot a compromise measure through Congress. Clay's tariff bill -- quickly passed in 1833 -- specified that all duties in excess of 20 percent of the value of the goods imported were to be reduced by easy stages, so that by 1842, the duties on all articles would reach the level of the moderate tariff of 1816.

Nullification leaders in South Carolina had expected the support of other Southern states, but without exception, the rest of the South declared South Carolina's course unwise and unconstitutional. Eventually, South Carolina rescinded its action. Both sides, nevertheless, claimed victory. Jackson had committed the federal government to the principle of Union supremacy. But South Carolina, by its show of resistance, had obtained many of the demands it sought, and had demonstrated that a single state could force its will on Congress.

5 0
3 years ago
PLZ HELP ME! List three similarities that Monks and friars have in common.
yaroslaw [1]
Monks and Friars both take vows of poverty.
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is a major effect of the Great Schism in modern life (todays times)
Kazeer [188]

The aftermath of the Great Schism was far-reaching. By far the most obvious consequence of the schism was the establishment of canonical division between the Western Catholic and Eastern Orthodox churches.

As demonstrated in the Fourth Crusade and the Sack of Constantinople in 1204, tensions between Western and Eastern Christians further escalated after the split. This schism established the unique identities of the Catholic and Orthodox Churches.

This is further explained below.

<h3>What is a major effect of the Great Schism on modern life?</h3>

Generally, The Great Schism had a variety of repercussions as a result. The most obvious and obvious consequence of the split was the official separation of the Eastern Orthodox churches and the Western Catholic churches. This was a significant impact of the schism.

In conclusion, As a result of the split, tensions between Western Christians and Eastern Christians escalated, as seen by events such as the Fourth Crusade and the sacking of Constantinople in 1204. Because of this schism, the Catholic Church and the Orthodox Church have always been able to differentiate themselves from one another.

Read more about  Great Schism

brainly.com/question/1461104

#SPJ1

3 0
2 years ago
Which explains why many people left England and came to the American colonies?
kotykmax [81]
The answer would be C. because the colonies were created for 1. the motherlands to get richer off the natural resources and 2 the places were getting crowded with debtors.
4 0
3 years ago
In a 1967 interview, Dr. Martin Luther King was asked, "What is it about the Negro_
Gennadij [26K]

discrimination

Explanation:

the negro still is not free

7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • HELP ME PLSSSSSS Looking at the picture
    9·1 answer
  • Forces that bind countries together are called?
    13·1 answer
  • True or false The 15th Amendment redefines the idea of the word citizen in the United States
    7·1 answer
  • What improvements did the Middle Kingdom rulers make
    5·1 answer
  • Why does conflict develop between people and their government?
    5·1 answer
  • plz help Which principle states that laws apply to all people equally? Common law Rule of law Transparency Civil law
    12·2 answers
  • One effective way for improving public education in texas that democrats, republicans, and tea partyers support is
    6·1 answer
  • HELPPPPP
    14·2 answers
  • How did Japanese soften up Singapore(ASAP)
    6·1 answer
  • Why would teachers support Ellis Arnall?
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!